Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2018] KEELRC 82 (KLR)

Gilbert Kambuni Ongeri v Kenyatta National Hospital Board [2018] KEELRC 82 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
3 December 2018
1,043 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court ruled that proved unpaid salary, leave and notice pay earn interest from filing suit, but general damages only from judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant filed a Notice of Motion dated 29th June 2018 seeking review of the court's judgment of 12th June 2018, in which the court had awarded him one month's salary in lieu of notice, pending leave days, unpaid salaries and allowances, damages for defamation and damages for unlawful dismissal. The review application sought to vary the interest provision so that interest would run from the date of filing the suit rather than from the date of judgment. The Claimant argued, citing Francis Joseph Kamau Ichatha v Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited and Dipak Emporium vs. Bond's Clothing, that the sums claimed (salary in lieu of notice, unpaid salary arrears, outstanding leave days and allowances) constituted special damages, which attract interest from the date of filing suit, unlike general damages which attract interest only from judgment. The Respondent opposed, relying on Zacharia Waweru Thumbi v Samuel Njoroge Thuku and Hahn v Singh, contending that special damages must be both pleaded and strictly proved and that the awarded sums did not fall into that category. Justice Hellen Wasilwa found that the special damages proved with documentary evidence were leave days, unpaid salaries, allowances and notice pay, and ordered that interest on those items run from the date of filing the claim. Interest on the damages for defamation and unlawful dismissal was to remain at court rates from the date of judgment. The review succeeded in part, with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Distinction between special and general damages for purposes of awarding interest

Holding

Special damages proved with documentary evidence attract interest from the date of filing of the suit; general damages attract interest from the date of judgment

Reasoning

The court relied on the authority of Dipak Emporium vs. Bond's Clothing as cited by Odunga J, which rests on section 26(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. Where a claimant is entitled to a liquidated amount deprived through the wrongful act of another, interest runs from the date of filing suit; where damages must be assessed by the court, the right to them arises only upon assessment, so interest runs from judgment. The items of notice pay, unpaid salaries, allowances and leave days were pleaded and proved with documentation, making them special damages, while damages for defamation and unlawful dismissal required assessment by the court.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Special damages must be both pleaded and strictly proved, usually by documentary evidence, and where so proved, interest on them accrues from the date of filing of the suit; interest on general damages accrues from the date of judgment

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Review of the judgment succeeds in part: interest on items 1 to 3 awarded to the Claimant to run from the date of filing of the claim
  2. 2.Interest on the damages awarded (defamation and unlawful dismissal) to remain at court rates with effect from the date of the judgment
  3. 3.No order as to costs on the application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 5)Section 26(1)

Cases cited (5)

  • Francis Joseph Kamau Ichatha v Housing Finance Company of Kenya Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • Samuel Philip Kidoti vs. Kenya Cargo Handling Services Ltd
    Civil Appeal No. 76 of 1992
  • Dipak Emporium vs. Bond's Clothing
    Civil Appeal No. 64 of 1972 [1973] EA 553
  • Zacharia Waweru Thumbi versus Samuel Njoroge Thuku
    (2006) EKLR
  • HAHN -VS- SINGH
    Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1983 [1985] KLR 716
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 26(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 5) - court's power to award interest; inherent review jurisdiction of the court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gilbert Kambuni Ongeri v Kenyatta National Hospital Board [2018] KEELRC 82 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2018). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2018/82/eng@2018-12-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.