Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNot stated (related suits ELRCC 545 of 2015 and 546 of 2015)· [2017] KEELRC 1918 (KLR)

Mwanahamisi Athman Ali v Muungano Social Club t/a Ali Bin Abi Talib Nursery School [2017] KEELRC 1918 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 January 2017
400 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court confirmed you can add new parties to a claim after filing, and opponents must file evidence, not just objections.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant brought a Notice of Motion dated 7 September 2016 seeking leave to amend the claim so as to enjoin Abbar Muhsin, Hussein B. Salim and Atmas Nasir as respondents in their capacities as chairman, secretary and treasurer of the respondent social club. The respondent opposed through grounds of objection filed on 28 September 2016, contending that no provision of law or rules of procedure permits joinder in employment and labour relations matters, which it said lie only between well-known parties. The motion was disposed of by written submissions, and counsel agreed that the outcome would apply to related suits ELRCC 546 of 2015 and 545 of 2015. The court framed two issues: competence and merits. On competence, Makau J agreed with the claimant that the motion lay under rule 14(b) of the court's procedure rules allowing amendment of filed pleadings, and that any lacuna could be filled by Order 1 rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules; the objection that new parties cannot be joined after filing was dismissed. On merits, the respondent had filed no affidavit contradicting the application, so the court granted the leave sought. Disposition: the motion was allowed as prayed, with the order extending to ELRCC 545 and 546 of 2015, and no orders as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competence of the motion for joinder by amendment

Holding

The motion was competently brought under rule 14(b) of the court's procedure rules, and any lacuna is fillable by Order 1 rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Reasoning

The claimant relied on rule 14(b) permitting amendment of filed pleadings to bring in a new defendant. The court agreed that amendment to join a new party is proper and that where the employment court rules are deficient, the Civil Procedure Rules supply the procedure. The respondent's objection that parties to employment matters must be well known to each other was dismissed.

p. 2
02

Merits of the joinder application

Holding

Leave to amend and join the intended parties was granted because the respondent filed no affidavit to challenge the merits.

Reasoning

The respondent opposed only on procedural grounds via a notice of grounds of objection and did not swear any affidavit contesting the substance of the application. In the absence of any evidentiary challenge to the merits, the court granted the leave sought and extended the order to two related suits with counsel's agreement.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A motion seeking leave to amend a memorandum of claim to join a new party is competent; new parties may be joined to a suit after it is filed, and any lacuna in the employment court rules may be filled by Order 1 rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to the claimant to amend the claim to enjoin Abbar Muhsin, Hussein B. Salim and Atmas Nasir as respondents in their capacity as chairman, secretary and treasurer of the respondent social club
  2. 2.The order shall apply to ELRCC 545 of 2015 and ELRCC 546 of 2015
  3. 3.No orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Rules of procedure of the Employment and Labour Relations Courtrule 14(b)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 rule 10
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court procedure rules, rule 14(b), with resort to Order 1 rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwanahamisi Athman Ali v Muungano Social Club t/a Ali Bin Abi Talib Nursery School [2017] KEELRC 1918 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated (related suits ELRCC 545 of 2015 and 546 of 2015). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2017/1918/eng@2017-01-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.