Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedMemorandum of Claim dated 17th September 2012 (filed 19th September 2012)· [2017] KEELRC 1799 (KLR)

Kennedy Juma Ojwang v Aegis Construction Co Ltd [2017] KEELRC 1799 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
10 February 2017
844 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that calling a dismissal 'redundancy' without following Section 40 legal steps makes it unfair, entitling the worker to compensation.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed by the Respondent as a driver from 1st November 2010, was terminated by an unsigned but stamped letter dated 26th May 2012 headed 'Redundancy', citing breakdown of the vehicle KAU 931S. He claimed salary arrears for May and June 2012, one month's salary in lieu of notice, and severance pay. The Respondent entered appearance but filed no reply and did not dispute the termination letter. The court framed the sole issue as whether the Claimant had proved his claim for terminal dues. The court found the termination was on account of redundancy as defined in Section 2 of the Employment Act, 2007 and the Labour Relations Act, 2007. Section 40 of the Employment Act sets out mandatory conditions for redundancy, including notification, payment in lieu of notice, and severance pay at not less than fifteen days' pay for each completed year of service. There was no evidence the Claimant received notice of the redundancy or was paid severance. By ignoring Section 40, the Respondent rendered the termination unfair under Section 45, and the court awarded three months' salary in compensation. The Claimant was held entitled to notice pay and severance pay. However, the claim for May and June 2012 salary arrears failed as there was no evidence he worked beyond 26th May 2012. Judgment was entered for Kshs. 90,000, comprising Kshs. 60,000 compensation, Kshs. 20,000 in lieu of notice, and Kshs. 10,000 severance for one year of service, with interest at court rates from the date of judgment, plus costs to the Claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment on account of redundancy complied with Section 40 of the Employment Act, 2007

Holding

The termination did not comply with Section 40; the Claimant was entitled to notice pay and severance pay, and the termination was unfair under Section 45, attracting three months' salary compensation

Reasoning

The termination letter declared the termination a redundancy. Section 40 requires notification, payment in lieu of notice and severance pay at not less than fifteen days' pay per completed year of service. There was no evidence the Claimant was given notice of the redundancy or paid severance pay as required by law. By ignoring Section 40, the Respondent rendered the termination unfair under Section 45, warranting compensation of three months' salary.

p. 3
02

Whether the Claimant was entitled to salary arrears for May and June 2012

Holding

The claim for salary arrears failed for lack of evidence that the Claimant worked beyond 26th May 2012

Reasoning

The Claimant claimed outstanding salaries for May and June 2012, but the termination letter took effect on 26th May 2012. Since there was no evidence that he worked beyond that date, there was no basis for the claimed salary arrears, and that head of claim failed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer terminating employment on account of redundancy must comply with the conditions in Section 40 of the Employment Act, including notice and payment of severance pay at not less than fifteen days' pay for each completed year of service; failure to do so renders the termination unfair under Section 45.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant: Kshs. 60,000 being three months' salary in compensation for unfair termination
  2. 2.Kshs. 20,000 being one month's salary in lieu of notice
  3. 3.Kshs. 10,000 being severance pay for one year of service (20,000/30x15)
  4. 4.Total award of Kshs. 90,000 with interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full
  5. 5.Claimant awarded costs of the case

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 2
  • Labour Relations Act, 2007definition of redundancy
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 40
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 45
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment claims under the Employment Act, 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kennedy Juma Ojwang v Aegis Construction Co Ltd [2017] KEELRC 1799 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Memorandum of Claim dated 17th September 2012 (filed 19th September 2012). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2017/1799/eng@2017-02-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.