Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedMisc Application No 121 of 2016· [2017] KEELRC 1650 (KLR)

David Nderitu Mwangi v Tusker Mattresses Limited [2017] KEELRC 1650 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
10 March 2017
374 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled it has no power to extend the three-year deadline for filing employment claims, even when a criminal case caused the delay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a miscellaneous application supported by an affidavit of Vincent Githu Kabi, Advocate, sworn on 26th October 2016, the Claimant sought leave of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi to file his claim against the Respondent out of time. He explained that the three-year limitation period under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 had expired because Criminal Case No. 1646 of 2008 (Republic v David Nderitu Mwangi), arising from the same circumstances, took seven years to determine and he was only acquitted on 30th June 2015. He further relied on a dispute reported to the Ministry of Labour in August 2015 and an alleged settlement commitment by the Respondent that was not honoured. The sole issue framed by the Court was whether the Claimant had made out a case for extension of time. The Court held, first, that the pendency of a criminal trial against an employee has no bearing on other processes relating to the employment contract, citing Timothy Asudi Malwa v E-Gap Solutions Limited. Secondly, following Maria Machocho v Total Kenya Limited, George Hiram Ndirangu v Equity Bank and Justus Ochido Ope v Kenyatta University, the Court held that it has no jurisdiction to extend time for filing claims falling under Section 90 of the Employment Act. The application dated 26th October 2016 was accordingly declined, with no order for costs. The judgment was delivered in open court at Nairobi on 10th March 2017 by Linnet Ndolo, Judge; Mr. Kithinji appeared for the Claimant and there was no appearance for the Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the pendency of Criminal Case No. 1646 of 2008 justified extension of time under Section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

No - the delay occasioned by the criminal case does not assist the Claimant, as the pendency of a criminal trial against an employee has no bearing on other processes relating to the employment contract.

Reasoning

The Claimant anchored his explanation for the three-year delay on the seven-year pendency of Republic v David Nderitu Mwangi, in which he was acquitted on 30th June 2015. The Court, citing its prior decision in Timothy Asudi Malwa v E-Gap Solutions Limited, held that the criminal proceedings were irrelevant to the employment-related claim and therefore could not ground an extension of time.

p. 1
02

Whether the Court has jurisdiction to extend time for filing claims under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007

Holding

No - the Court has no such jurisdiction, following prior decisions of the Court.

Reasoning

Relying on Maria Machocho v Total Kenya Limited, George Hiram Ndirangu v Equity Bank and Justus Ochido Ope v Kenyatta University, the Court held that Section 90's limitation period cannot be extended by the Court. Since the Court lacks jurisdiction to extend time, the merits of the explanation for delay became immaterial and the application fell to be dismissed.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • The Court has no jurisdiction to extend time for filing of claims falling under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  • The pendency of a criminal trial against an employee has no bearing on other processes relating to the employment contract.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Claimant's application dated 26th October 2016 seeking leave to file his claim out of time is declined
  2. 2.No order for costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 90

Cases cited (4)

  • Timothy Asudi Malwa v E-Gap Solutions Limited & another
    [2014] eKLR
  • Maria Machocho v Total Kenya Limited
    [2013] eKLR
  • George Hiram Ndirangu v Equity Bank
    [2015] eKLR
  • Justus Ochido Ope v Kenyatta University
    [2016] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007 (court's lack of jurisdiction to extend time for filing claims thereunder)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "David Nderitu Mwangi v Tusker Mattresses Limited [2017] KEELRC 1650 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Misc Application No 121 of 2016. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2017/1650/eng@2017-03-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.