Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedELRC Cause No. 1037 of 2015 (formerly HCC Misc. Application No. 509 of 2014)· [2016] KEELRC 1791 (KLR)

Eunice Chebukkwa Wanjala v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd [2016] KEELRC 1791 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
15 January 2016
1,374 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed a former banker's delayed lawsuit because the same issue had already been decided, and she hadn't disclosed that earlier case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, dismissed by Kenya Commercial Bank in June 2004, sought leave to file suit out of time via an Originating Summons filed at the High Court as Misc. Application No. 509 of 2014, later transferred to the ELRC and registered as Cause No. 1037 of 2015. The Respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 8th June 2015 arguing the application was res judicata, having been substantively raised and determined in ELRC Cause No. 1150 of 2013, where on 4th April 2014 Nduma J., relying on Divecon Ltd v Saurani, held the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a suit in contract filed beyond the six-year period under Section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act, and dismissed it. The Respondent invoked Sections 7 and 8 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Mukisa Biscuits test on preliminary objections. The Claimant's Reply did not address res judicata, raising instead disability under Section 22 of the Limitation of Actions Act, her arrest and criminal trial, and Article 159(2) on procedural technicalities. The court found the parties and subject matter identical, that the limitation issue had already been determined and not appealed, and that the Claimant had failed to disclose the prior proceedings. It held the suit res judicata and dismissed the entire suit with costs to the Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Res judicata

Holding

The Originating Summons is res judicata as the issue of extension of time/limitation was heard and determined in ELRC Cause No. 1150 of 2013 between the same parties

Reasoning

The court found the parties in both suits identical, the dispute being the alleged wrongful dismissal of the Claimant by the Respondent in 2004. The limitation issue was litigated and determined in Cause No. 1150 of 2013 by a Ruling delivered on 4th April 2014, which the Claimant did not appeal. Instead she filed a subsequent suit at the High Court on the same issue without disclosing the earlier proceedings, offending Sections 7 and 8 of the Civil Procedure Act.

p. 3
02

Candour / clean hands

Holding

The Applicant did not approach the court with clean hands as she failed to disclose the existence and determination of Cause No. 1150 of 2013

Reasoning

In filing Misc. Application No. 509 of 2014 at the High Court, the Claimant did not disclose that the identical limitation issue had already been heard and determined in ELRC Cause No. 1150 of 2013. The court considered this non-disclosure materially misleading and found that the Applicant therefore did not come to court with clean hands, which weighed against entertaining the fresh application.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A suit whose subject matter has already been heard and determined between the same parties is res judicata and the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it again
  • Section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act bars actions founded on contract after six years

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The entire suit is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the suit awarded to the Respondent
On appeal from
null
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under its establishing statute; suit transferred from the High Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Eunice Chebukkwa Wanjala v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd [2016] KEELRC 1791 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). ELRC Cause No. 1037 of 2015 (formerly HCC Misc. Application No. 509 of 2014). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/1791/eng@2016-01-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.