Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union v Wilhan (K) Ltd & another [2016] KEELRC 1750 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan employment court spared a union's case from dismissal after a missed hearing, but made the union pay adjournment costs for its lack of diligence.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Union's failure to attend the hearing dated 30 November 2015 should attract sanctions
The non-attendance was potentially excusable because the Deputy Registrar may not have notified the Union of the hearing date, but the Union's own lack of diligence contributed; the Cause was not dismissed but an adjournment costs order was made against it
The record showed no compliance by the Deputy Registrar with the directive to notify the Union of the hearing date, making the Union's absence potentially excusable. However, had the Union been diligent and attended delivery of the ruling or followed up, it would have known the status of its claim. Balancing expeditious disposal of industrial disputes, the court granted a fresh hearing date but ordered the Union to pay adjournment costs.
Legal principles established
#- Parties must ensure suits are prosecuted and determined expeditiously, particularly where industrial peace is a primary concern
Court orders
#- 1.A mutually convenient date be fixed immediately after delivery of the ruling for the hearing of the Cause
- 2.The Union to pay forthwith costs (adjournment) attendant to the hearing which had been scheduled for 30 November 2015
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over the Cause filed by the Union (Cause No. 313 of 2014)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union v Wilhan (K) Ltd & another [2016] KEELRC 1750 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Cause No. 313 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/1750/eng@2016-02-05
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.