Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherPetition No. 66 of 2015· [2016] KEELRC 1735 (KLR)

Samwel Njega & 21 others v Inspector General of Police & another [2016] KEELRC 1735 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Nairobi
5 February 2016
437 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled a withdrawn case doesn't block a new one, allowing 22 police officers to challenge their transfers.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on a preliminary objection in a petition filed on 4th August 2015 by 22 traffic police officers stationed at Kabete Police Station against the Inspector General of Police and the National Police Service Commission. The petitioners challenged their transfer by police signal dated 30th July 2015 to various stations across the country, alleging the transfers were arbitrary, conducted without following established procedure, prompted by extraneous considerations, and effected by the 1st respondent without the participation of the 2nd respondent, whom they contended alone had authority to transfer officers. They were required to report to new postings on 7th August 2015 and sought interim orders, which were not granted ex parte. The 2nd respondent's preliminary objection rested on the assertion that the dispute had been the subject of ELRC Petition No. 10 of 2015 at Nairobi. The court found that following that earlier suit, the transfers were rescinded on 18th March 2015 and the suit was withdrawn before Justice Nzioki wa Makau on 20th April 2015, the grievances having been addressed. It noted the petitioners failed to disclose these material facts. Nevertheless, since the earlier petition was withdrawn and not heard and determined, res judicata did not arise. The respondents' authorities were found not on point. The preliminary objection was not upheld and the petition was allowed to proceed to hearing on the merits.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the prior proceedings in ELRC Petition No. 10 of 2015 rendered this petition res judicata

Holding

Res judicata does not apply because the earlier petition was withdrawn before hearing and determination, the transfers having been rescinded and the grievances addressed

Reasoning

The court accepted that the issues in dispute had been the subject of Petition No. 10 of 2015, in which the transfers were rescinded on 18th March 2015 and the suit withdrawn before Justice Nzioki wa Makau on 20th April 2015. However, because a withdrawn suit is not one heard and determined on the merits, the plea of res judicata fails. The court noted the petitioners did not disclose these material facts, but this did not justify upholding the objection.

p. 2
02

Whether the authorities cited by the respondents supported the preliminary objection

Holding

The authorities cited were not on point and did not assist the respondents

Reasoning

The court briefly considered the respondents' submissions and authorities and found them inapplicable to the circumstances of the petition, without detailed analysis, before declining to uphold the preliminary objection.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Res judicata does not arise where a prior suit was withdrawn and not heard and determined on the merits

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is not upheld
  2. 2.The petition may proceed to hearing on merits
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2) of the Constitution (employment and labour relations jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court); petition under the Bill of Rights

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Samwel Njega & 21 others v Inspector General of Police & another [2016] KEELRC 1735 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Petition No. 66 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/1735/eng@2016-02-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.