Erickson Ouma v Perfect Scan (K) Ltd [2016] KEELRC 1708 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A security guard who resigned still won his unpaid leave, allowances and certificate of service, but lost service pay because NSSF contributions were made.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the claimant resigned or was unlawfully dismissed
The claimant voluntarily resigned effective 19.3.2014; the dismissal allegation failed for want of evidence
The respondent, despite pleading summary dismissal for gross misconduct, called no witnesses. The claimant's unrebutted testimony showed he served a resignation notice on 15.2.2014, was allowed to serve his notice period and cleared with the company. The receipt of the resignation notice was admitted in the defence. The claim of gross misconduct therefore collapsed for lack of evidence.
Entitlement to terminal dues following voluntary resignation
Leave for 3 years, welfare deductions, uniform levy and bicycle allowance awarded; service pay refused; certificate of service granted
Because the claimant resigned, no declaration of unlawful termination issued. Leave accruals were limited to three years by the section 90 limitation bar. Service pay was barred by section 35(6) Employment Act given NSSF contributions, and gratuity barred by Rule 17 of the Protective Security Services Order since he terminated services voluntarily. A certificate of service was awarded as a statutory right under section 51.
Legal principles established
#- Unrebutted evidence stands; a respondent who calls no witness cannot sustain an allegation of dismissal for gross misconduct
- An employee who resigns is not entitled to service pay where NSSF contributions were made, under section 35(6) Employment Act
- Under Rule 17 of the Regulations of Wages (Protective Security Services) Order 1998, an employee who terminates his services for any reason other than certified ill-health or retirement age is not entitled to a gratuity
- Certificate of service is a statutory right of every employee under section 51 of the Employment Act
Court orders
#- 1.Judgment entered for the claimant in the sum of kshs. 39,150/= (leave for 3 years kshs. 24,150; welfare deductions refund kshs. 1,200; uniform levy refund kshs. 4,200; bicycle allowance kshs. 9,600)
- 2.Claimant to be issued with a certificate of service
- 3.Costs of the suit to the claimant
- 4.Interest on the awarded amount
- Jurisdiction invoked
- First-instance claim under the Employment Act (Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Erickson Ouma v Perfect Scan (K) Ltd [2016] KEELRC 1708 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/1708/eng@2016-02-12
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.