Alex Musembi Mulili v Jacob Nzioki Kwesi & 3 others [2016] KEELRC 1510 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan employer's own letter confirming an employee's job and salary defeated its 'student attachment' defence, costing it Kshs 234,000 for unlawful dismissal.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the claimant was an employee or a student on attachment
The claimant proved on a balance of probabilities that he was an employee as a Medical Laboratory Technician; the respondent's letter of 13th June 2011 confirming employment from 1st July 2008 and salary of Kshs 18,000 defeated the attachment defence.
The respondent's letter to Select Management Services confirmed the claimant was its employee as a Medical Laboratory Technician since 1st July 2008 earning Kshs 18,000 monthly. That documentary evidence directly contradicted the oral testimony of RW1 and RW2. Though the claimant may initially have been attached as a student on allowance, he obtained registration on 13th May 2009 and acquired legal capacity to be employed. The claimant was found credible; the respondent's witnesses were not.
Whether the summary dismissal was lawful and fair
The dismissal was unlawful and unfair, entitling the claimant to compensation under section 49(1)(c) as read with section 49(4) of the Employment Act 2007; 8 months' salary awarded.
The claimant was dismissed without notice, notice to show cause, disciplinary hearing or any reason assigned. He had served three years continuously with no adverse employment record, lost career prospects at an early age, received no terminal benefits or certificate of service, and was denied letters of employment and payslips. The court treated this as malicious treatment and awarded eight months' salary as compensation for dismissal contrary to section 45 of the Employment Act 2007.
Entitlement to terminal benefits - notice pay, NHIF/NSSF refunds and leave
Notice pay of one month (Kshs 18,000), NHIF/NSSF refunds (Kshs 18,000 total) and 63 leave days (Kshs 54,000) awarded; house allowance claim dismissed for want of proof.
The claimant proved he was summarily dismissed without notice or payment in lieu, so one month's salary in lieu of notice was awarded. In the absence of contrary documentary evidence, the court found the respondent deducted but failed to remit NHIF and NSSF. The Employment Act guarantees every permanent employee at least 21 days leave per completed year, yielding 63 days over three years. However, the house allowance claim failed because there was no written contract and the salary exceeded the general minimum wage.
Legal principles established
#- Summary dismissal without notice, notice to show cause, disciplinary hearing or any reason assigned is unlawful and unfair, attracting compensation under section 49(1)(c) as read with section 49(4) of the Employment Act 2007.
- An employer's own written document confirming employment terms prevails over contradictory oral testimony.
Court orders
#- 1.Kshs 144,000 compensation for unlawful and unfair dismissal (8 months' salary)
- 2.Kshs 10,800 refund of NHIF deductions not remitted
- 3.Kshs 7,200 refund of NSSF deductions not remitted
- 4.Kshs 18,000 one month's salary in lieu of notice
- 5.Kshs 54,000 in lieu of 63 leave days not taken
- 6.Total award of Kshs 234,000 payable with interest at court rates from date of filing suit till payment in full
- 7.Respondent to pay the costs of the suit
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act 2007 (unfair and unlawful termination claims)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Alex Musembi Mulili v Jacob Nzioki Kwesi & 3 others [2016] KEELRC 1510 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Cause No. 1913 of 2011. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/1510/eng@2016-03-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.