Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 1776 of 2014· [2016] KEELRC 1191 (KLR)

Banking, Insurance & Finance Union (Kenya) v Maisha Bora Sacco Society Limited [2016] KEELRC 1191 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
21 March 2016
5,502 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~22 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's employment court ordered a Sacco to recognise its employees' union and pay union dues from its own accounts, but refused to convert fixed-term contracts to permanent jobs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (M. Mbaru, J) determined a claim by the Banking, Insurance & Finance Union (Kenya) against Maisha Bora Sacco Society Limited seeking recognition, deduction and remittance of union dues, and restraint on changing terms of service. The Respondent, a co-operative and Sacco society, contended its employees were on fixed-term contracts which had lapsed, that the union had not established a simple majority, and that no Ministerial order for check-off had been served. The court held that the right to unionise under article 41 of the Constitution read with article 36 exists irrespective of the nature of the employment contract. Accepting the conciliator's finding that 54 of 55 unionisable employees had been recruited (98.2%), uncontroverted by the Respondent, and corroborated by pay slips showing dues deducted in July 2014, the court found the Claimant had attained simple majority as at 4th February 2014 and was entitled to recognition under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act. The Ministerial order in Gazette Notice No.516 of 2009 bound the Respondent to deduct and remit dues; deducted but unremitted dues are payable from the Respondent's own accounts under section 82. However, agency fees were refused as no CBA existed, and the claim to convert fixed-term contracts to permanent ones failed, the court applying Chacha Mwita v KEMRI and Rajab Barasa v Kenya Meat Commission on automatic expiry by effluxion of time. Judgment was entered for the Claimant with orders for signing of a Recognition Agreement within seven days (failing which the Registrar would sign), payment of dues from the Respondent's own accounts from 4th February 2014 until each member ceased employment, a list of unionisable employees for computation, interest, and costs to the Claimant. Cause No.2298 of 2014 was to proceed on merit with recognition now established.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Claimant attained the simple majority required for recognition under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

Yes, the Claimant had 50-55 check-offs as at 4th February 2014, exceeding the simple majority of the Respondent's unionisable employees; the conciliator's finding of 54 of 55 unionisable employees (98.2%) was accepted uncontradicted

Reasoning

The conciliator established 54 of 55 unionisable employees had been recruited, being 98.2%. The Respondent, in its statement of response and affidavit, never stated its actual number of unionisable employees. Pay slips for July 2014 showed deductions of union dues, corroborating recognition in practice. The court accepted the conciliator's findings as uncontroverted and held simple majority was attained as at 4th February 2014, obliging recognition under section 54.

p. 5
02

Whether union dues were payable despite the Respondent's employees being on fixed-term contracts

Holding

Yes; while the employment relationship subsisted, the employees were unionised and dues were payable from March 2014 at Kshs.250.00 and Kshs.100.00 to the Claimant and COTU respectively

Reasoning

The right to unionise is secured under article 41 of the Constitution regardless of the nature of the employment contract. While the fixed-term employment subsisted, the employees became unionised upon submission of check-offs. The Ministerial order under Gazette Notice No.516 of 2009 mandated employers of five or more members to deduct and remit dues; section 48(3) obliged the Respondent to commence deductions within 30 days of service of check-offs.

p. 9
03

Whether agency fees were payable under section 49(1)

Holding

No agency fees due since no CBA existed between the parties

Reasoning

Section 49(1) agency fees depend on the existence of a collective agreement between the union and the employer. No CBA had been concluded or registered with the Court during the litigation period, so agency fees were not due.

p. 7
04

Whether fixed-term contracts should be converted to permanent employment

Holding

No; fixed-term contracts are valid and expire automatically on their expiry date, and none were shown to have been entered into illegally, under duress, coercion or fraud

Reasoning

The court recognised fixed-term contracts as lawful, relying on Chacha Mwita v KEMRI and Rajab Barasa v Kenya Meat Commission. The Claimant had not concluded any CBA addressing contract nature, and members were bound by their individual fixed-term contracts until renewal or change by mutual consent.

p. 8
05

Sanction for non-remittance of dues deducted

Holding

Section 82 provides for payment of dues from the employer's own account with a penalty of Kshs.10,000, though the court opted to foster harmonious industrial relations

Reasoning

The Respondent deducted dues in July 2014 but failed to remit or make returns, contravening section 50 which is mandatory and whose contravention is a criminal offence. The statutory sanction under section 82 is a Kshs.10,000 penalty, but the court declined to impose it to foster peaceful industrial relations, while ordering dues payable from the Respondent's own accounts.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • The right to unionise is constitutionally secured and cannot be taken away by the nature of the employment contract, including fixed-term contracts
  • Once a trade union submits check-offs of more than five unionisable employees and a Ministerial order exists, the employer must deduct and remit union dues; failure obliges the employer to pay the dues from its own account
  • A valid fixed-term contract terminates automatically on its expiry date by effluxion of time and such termination is not necessarily a dismissal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent shall sign a Recognition Agreement with the Claimant within seven (7) days of the judgment
  2. 2.Where the Respondent fails to comply, the Registrar of the Court shall sign such Recognition Agreement for and on behalf of the Respondent
  3. 3.Union dues shall be payable from the Respondent's own account(s) covering 4th February 2014 up and until each Claimant member ceased employment with the Respondent
  4. 4.The Respondent shall within 7 days submit to the Court a full list of all unionisable employees covered in the submitted check-offs stating date of employment and date of termination, forming the basis for computation of dues owing for Court assessment within the next fourteen (14) days
  5. 5.Where the Respondent fails to comply, the Claimant shall submit within 14 days the dues owing and not paid by the Respondent for their members from 4th February 2014
  6. 6.Interest is due on the amounts owing at (d) or (e) above
  7. 7.Costs of the suit to the Claimant
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over trade union recognition and union dues disputes under the Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (2)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Banking, Insurance & Finance Union (Kenya) v Maisha Bora Sacco Society Limited [2016] KEELRC 1191 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Cause No. 1776 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/1191/eng@2016-03-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.