Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 20.4.2016 (in the main suit)· [2016] KEELRC 930 (KLR)

Alfonso Katheka Munyali & another v Council of the Kenya School of Government & 3 others [2016] KEELRC 930 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
15 July 2016
1,856 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court in Mombasa refused to jail Kenya School of Government officials for contempt, finding they obeyed the court order as written.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimants, Alfonso Kitheka Munyahi and Jeremiah Nyaberi Ichwara, Campus Directors of the Kenya School of Government Mombasa and Matuga Campuses respectively, brought a Notice of Motion dated 20.4.2016 seeking committal to civil jail of the 1st and 2nd respondents (the School and Dr. Ludeki Chweya) with a fine, for alleged breach of conservatory orders issued on 31.7.2015. Those orders had restrained the respondents from removing the claimants from their positions and directed that they continue discharging their duties as Campus Directors 'with full benefits' pending trial. The claimants contended they were denied salary, allowances and a vehicle under KSG Scale 2 of the KSG Terms and Conditions of Service. The respondents denied breach, asserting full compliance and that entitlement to KSG Scale 2 benefits was the substratum of the suit, triable at trial. The court framed two issues: ambiguity of the order and deliberate disobedience. It held the order clear and unambiguous, preserving the status quo and the salaries the claimants were already drawing; it found the claimants were never granted KSG Scale 2 benefits, which had not been sought in the conservatory application. Allegations concerning the 3rd and 4th respondents, vehicles and deputy directors were new matters involving strangers to the suit on which the court declined to comment. The Motion was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Ambiguity of the conservatory order dated 31.7.2015

Holding

The order was clear and unambiguous; it preserved the claimants' status as Campus Directors with the salaries they were drawing before the order, not KSG Scale 2 benefits.

Reasoning

The court perused the order as made and as extracted and served. It found the order preserved the claimants' position as Campus Directors pending trial. The phrase 'full benefits' referred to the salaries already being drawn, not new benefits under KSG Scale 2, which was never sought in the application for conservatory orders and forms the substratum of the suit to be determined at trial.

p. 3
02

Whether the cited respondents were in contempt

Holding

No contempt was established; the respondents complied with the order as sought and granted, and the claimants were not entitled to enforce KSG Scale 2 benefits at the interlocutory stage.

Reasoning

The respondents demonstrated compliance through correspondences and payslips showing the claimants continued discharging directorial duties and drawing their pre-order salaries. The claim for KSG Scale 2 salary was never sought in the conservatory application and must await trial. Allegations of benefits to the 3rd and 4th respondents, failure to allocate vehicles and recruitment of deputies were new matters involving strangers to the suit on whom the court declined to comment without hearing them.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking committal for contempt must show deliberate disobedience of a clear and unambiguous court order; where the order merely preserves the status quo and the respondents comply with it as granted, contempt is not made out.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Notice of Motion dated 20.4.2016 dismissed
  2. 2.Costs to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Kenya School of Government Actsection 21
  • KSG Terms and Conditions of Service (KSG TCS) manualsection 33
Jurisdiction invoked
Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction; contempt of court orders issued by this court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Alfonso Katheka Munyali & another v Council of the Kenya School of Government & 3 others [2016] KEELRC 930 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Notice of Motion dated 20.4.2016 (in the main suit). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/930/eng@2016-07-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.