Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedPetition No. 10 of 2015· [2016] KEELRC 878 (KLR)

Gideon Bore & 32 others v Baringo County Public Service Board & 3 others [2016] KEELRC 878 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya
22 July 2016
1,442 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that 33 Baringo youth polytechnic instructors must be absorbed on permanent and pensionable terms from July 2015, not short contracts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Thirty-three Youth Polytechnic Instructors appointed in May 2011 by the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports on three-year contracts petitioned the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru after they were appointed by the County Government of Baringo, through the 1st Respondent's decision, on one-year fixed term contracts effective 1 July 2015. Their case was that pursuant to devolution of vocational training under the Constitution of 2010 and a resolution of an intergovernmental consultative forum of 2 December 2014, they ought to have been absorbed on permanent and pensionable terms with effect from 1 July 2015, and that the short-term contracts were discriminatory. The 1st Respondent did not enter appearance or file an answer; the 3rd and 4th Respondents filed submissions through the Attorney General. The Court adopted the Petitioners' framed issues and held that the forum resolution bound the 1st Respondent, as County Governments were represented through the Council of Governors Committee on Education, and that the Board had not demonstrated any budgetary engagement with the Treasury to justify non-compliance. The Court noted an out-of-court settlement offering absorption from 1 July 2016, holding that unless all Petitioners accepted that date, absorption should be backdated to 1 July 2015. It also noted the Petitioners had not demonstrated requirements for grade J under the Scheme of Service. The Petition was allowed with declarations that the Petitioners are entitled to absorption on permanent and pensionable basis from 1 July 2015 and that the 1st Respondent implement the forum resolution. Costs were awarded to the Petitioners.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Petitioners were entitled to absorption on permanent and pensionable terms rather than one-year fixed term contracts

Holding

Yes. The County Public Service Board was bound by the intergovernmental forum resolution of 2 December 2014 to absorb ESP staff, including the Petitioners, on permanent and pensionable terms with effect from 1 July 2015, and could not impose one-year contracts.

Reasoning

The Petitioners, as Youth Polytechnic Instructors, fell under the devolved function of vocational training. At an intergovernmental consultative forum of 2 December 2014 attended by all stakeholders, including the Council of Governors, it was resolved that ESP staff be absorbed on permanent and pensionable terms from 1 July 2015. The 1st Respondent, being represented through the Council of Governors, was bound by that resolution and offered no lawful justification, such as demonstrated budgetary engagement with the Treasury, for departing from it.

p. 4
02

Whether the out-of-court settlement offering absorption from 1 July 2016 displaces the 1 July 2015 effective date

Holding

Only with Petitioners' acceptance; otherwise absorption must be backdated to 1 July 2015.

Reasoning

The further affidavit exhibited an offer by the 1st Respondent to appoint the Petitioners on permanent and pensionable terms from 1 July 2016. The Court held that absent acceptance by all Petitioners of that later effective date, the absorption should take effect from the forum resolution date of 1 July 2015.

p. 4
03

Whether the Petitioners qualified for appointment to grade J under the Scheme of Service

Holding

The Court noted the Petitioners did not demonstrate possession of the specific requirements for grade J (Training of Trainers Certificate and a Diploma).

Reasoning

Before concluding, the Court observed that the Scheme of Service relied on by the Petitioners provided job group H as the entry grade, and grade J carried specific requirements including a Training of Trainers Certificate and a Diploma, which the Petitioners had not demonstrated they possessed. This was noted without altering the relief granted.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A county public service board is bound by resolutions of an intergovernmental consultative forum at which county governments were represented, and cannot lawfully decline to absorb staff on permanent and pensionable terms absent budgetary engagement with the Treasury.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the Petitioners are entitled to be absorbed by the 1st Respondent in its regular establishment on permanent and pensionable basis
  2. 2.Order that the 1st Respondent implement the decision of the Intergovernmental consultative forum made on 2 December 2014 to absorb the Petitioners on permanent and pensionable basis from 1 July 2015
  3. 3.Petitioners to have costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 3, 6, 10, 27, 41, 47 & 50
  • Employment ActSections 5, 9 & 10
  • County Governments ActSections 3, 55, 57 & 59
  • Intergovernmental Relations ActSections 3 & 4

Cases cited (3)

  • Kenya National Union of Nurses v Public Service Commission of Kenya & 2 Ors
    (2015) eKLR
  • Kenya National Union of Nurses v Council of Governors & 6 Ors
    (2016) eKLR
  • Muranga County Public Service Board v Grace N. Makori & 178 Ors
    (2015) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 3, 6, 10, 27, 41, 47 & 50 of the Constitution of Kenya; Sections 5, 9 & 10 of the Employment Act, 2007; Sections 3, 55, 57 & 59 of the County Governments Act; Sections 3 & 4 of the Intergovernmental Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gideon Bore & 32 others v Baringo County Public Service Board & 3 others [2016] KEELRC 878 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Petition No. 10 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/878/eng@2016-07-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.