Paul Ndungu Ndichu v Amos Mathenge Kabuthu & another [2016] KEELRC 732 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court ruled that only the Registrar of Societies' official membership list can decide who elects the AIPCA Archbishop, dismissing attempts to alter it mid-term.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Valid resignation of Bertha Mwangi
Resignation not proved; advert treated as contested and invalid
The Applicants relied on a newspaper advert claiming Bertha Mwangi resigned as Vice Treasurer. The Claimants denied the resignation and questioned who paid for and posted the advert. No evidence was adduced identifying who posted it, so the Applicants failed to discharge the burden of proof.
Suspension of Bishop Julius Kamwaro
Suspension invalid for non-compliance with the AIPCA Constitution's disciplinary procedure
The Constitution requires investigation, an investigation report forwarded to the Central Board, and written approval signed by the Archbishop, National Chairman and Secretary General. No investigation report was attached and no evidence showed Central Board sanction; the suspension without due process does not affect his membership.
Removal of National Chairman Paul Watoro Gichu
Removal treated as invalid; Gichu remains Chairman
The removal letter dated 13th June 2014 referenced a minute dated 2nd July 2014, an internal contradiction in dates. The Applicants had also been cited for contempt in Civil 124/2014 for introducing a new list of Bishops. Given these contradictions, the removal was suspect and not sanctioned by law.
Composition of the legitimate Central Board eligible to elect the Archbishop
The authentic list is that from the Registrar of Societies records as submitted by the Claimant, subject to deceased members
Under the AIPCA Constitution, board members hold office for five years until the next general meeting. The last elections were held in 2012 and five years had not elapsed. Changing the list midstream is an illegality. The Registrar of Societies records in Appendices 3a to 4 of the Claimant's documents therefore prevail.
Legal principles established
#- A resignation asserted by a party must be proved by that party; where it is denied and no evidence shows who posted the resignation notice, it is treated as contested and invalid
- Suspension or removal of a church official without following the constitutionally prescribed disciplinary procedure is of no effect
- Elected board members hold office for five years and cannot be replaced mid-term by extra-constitutional means
Court orders
#- 1.The Amended Notice of Motion dated 19.8.2016 is dismissed
- 2.The Court's orders of 29.7.2016 be enforced following the list submitted in Appendix 3a to 3dd and PNN 4 of the Claimants' application dated 4/8/2016
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Inherent and interlocutory jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court over a matter pending before it (subordinate to the orders of Nduma Nderi J of 5/8/2016 in the same suit); no specific provision cited
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Paul Ndungu Ndichu v Amos Mathenge Kabuthu & another [2016] KEELRC 732 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/732/eng@2016-09-01
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.