Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2016] KEELRC 502 (KLR)

Augustus Mbusya Ndilo v Swedken Tours [2016] KEELRC 502 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
14 October 2016
409 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan driver underpaid below the legal minimum wage won back-pay and six months' salary after his employer fired him without a disciplinary hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an ex parte employment claim before the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi. The claimant, employed as a driver from 2nd November 2012, alleged he was paid a basic salary of Kshs.3,000 (plus 17% commission on collections) far below the prevailing Wages Order minimum for a Nairobi driver (Kshs.13,201.55), was never paid house allowance, never went on leave, and worked uncompensated overtime. He averred that on 31st May 2014 he was stopped from working without reason, and testified that he was verbally terminated over an accusation of siphoning fuel after his vehicle showed high fuel consumption, without any disciplinary hearing. The respondent, though represented and served, filed no response, and the suit proceeded ex parte, leaving the claimant's evidence uncontested. The court held that the onus of proving reasons for termination always rests with the employer. It awarded the difference between the prescribed minimum wage and the Kshs.3,000 actually paid for eighteen months, leave allowance of Kshs.4,740.00, one month's pay in lieu of notice (Kshs.13,201.55), and six months' salary (Kshs.79,209.30) as compensation for unfair termination. The respondent was also ordered to issue a certificate of service, and to pay costs of the suit. Judgment was delivered at Nairobi on 14th October 2016 by Abuodha Jorum Nelson J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Minimum wage underpayment

Holding

The claimant was underpaid; awarded the difference between the prescribed wage of Kshs.13,201.55 and the Kshs.3,000 paid for eighteen months.

Reasoning

The relevant Wages Order prescribed a minimum monthly salary of Kshs.13,201.55 for a driver in Nairobi, while the claimant was paid Kshs.3,000. Since the suit proceeded ex parte and the claimant's evidence was uncontested, the court awarded the shortfall limited to eighteen months.

p. 1
02

Unfair termination

Holding

The verbal termination without a disciplinary hearing was unfair; six months' salary awarded as compensation plus one month's pay in lieu of notice.

Reasoning

The claimant testified he was verbally terminated on allegations of siphoning fuel without any disciplinary hearing. The matter proceeded ex parte, so the respondent led no evidence. The onus of proving reasons for termination lies with the employer, which the respondent failed to discharge; the court awarded six months' salary as compensation and one month's pay in lieu of notice.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • The burden of proving reasons for termination rests with the employer.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Award of the difference between the prescribed minimum wage of Kshs.13,201.55 and the Kshs.3,000 per month actually paid for eighteen months
  2. 2.Award of leave allowance of Kshs.4,740.00
  3. 3.Award of one month's pay in lieu of notice of Kshs.13,201.55
  4. 4.Award of six months' salary as compensation for unfair termination of service of Kshs.79,209.30
  5. 5.Costs of the suit to the claimant
  6. 6.Respondent to issue the claimant with a certificate of service

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Wages Order (Regulation of Wages)minimum wage for a driver in Nairobi
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment claims (not expressly stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Augustus Mbusya Ndilo v Swedken Tours [2016] KEELRC 502 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/502/eng@2016-10-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.