Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No 97 of 2015· [2016] KEELRC 459 (KLR)

Jack Waswa Wanyama v Punchlines Limited [2016] KEELRC 459 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
14 October 2016
978 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court upheld a dismissal where the employer proved valid reasons and followed fair disciplinary procedure.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant alleged he was orally employed by the respondent as an Assistant Supervisor on 29th March 2007 at a gross salary of Kshs. 20,535 and that his services were terminated on 29th September 2014 on account of a delay in performing an assignment, for which he said he was unfairly blamed as the issue was beyond his control. He further alleged he was issued a backdated warning letter and summoned to a hearing without advance notice. The respondent denied the claim, asserting that the claimant failed to timely service an order for an Ethiopian client and a 5,000-brochure order for Commercial Bank of Africa, of which only some 350-500 brochures were delivered, leading to cancellation, loss of cash and loss of business and reputation. It contended the claimant was formally summoned to a disciplinary hearing, admitted liability, and was informed of his right to appeal. The respondent's witnesses, Mr. Maritim and Mr. Musya, testified that the claimant rose from general worker to Assistant Supervisor in charge of the binding section and was responsible for the orders. The court held that the burden of proving the reasons for termination lies on the employer; that the respondent sufficiently showed the CBA order was cancelled due to delay, occasioning loss; and that breach of the employee's duty of care and skill is a valid and justifiable reason for dismissal. The court found valid reasons for termination and a fair procedure, dismissed the claim with costs, and ordered accordingly on 14th October 2016 at Nairobi.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of the reasons for termination

Holding

Valid reasons existed - the claimant's failure to service the CBA Bank order in time led to its cancellation and loss

Reasoning

The court held the burden of proving reasons for termination lies on the employer. The respondent demonstrated, through documents and oral evidence, that the CBA Bank order was cancelled due to delay, and the claimant did not deny responsibility for servicing the order. Cancellation occasioned loss since tailor-made material had been prepared. The claimant's assertion that the delay was beyond his control was not accepted.

p. 2
02

Fairness of the procedure followed

Holding

The termination was carried out through a fair procedure; the claimant was summoned to a disciplinary hearing, admitted liability, and was informed of his right to appeal

Reasoning

The respondent averred that the claimant was formally summoned on 26th September 2014 to a disciplinary hearing on 29th September 2014 and could be accompanied by a staff member of his choice. At the hearing he admitted liability for the delay and cancellation of the orders, and the committee recommended dismissal while informing him of his right to appeal. The court accepted this account.

p. 1
03

Duty of care and skill owed by an employee

Holding

Breach of the employee's duty of care and skill is a valid and justifiable reason for dismissal

Reasoning

The court articulated the principle that in an employment relationship the employee owes the employer a duty of care and skill, and that breach of this duty justifies dismissal. It applied this to the claimant's failure to timely complete the CBA brochures order and the Ethiopian client order, which resulted in cancellations, loss of cash, business and reputation.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • On a suit for termination of employment, the burden of proving the reasons for termination lies on the employer
  • An employee owes the employer a duty of care and skill, and breach of that duty is a valid and justifiable reason for dismissal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claim is dismissed with costs
  2. 2.It is so ordered
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court, first-instance claim for unfair termination (Court established under Article 162(2) of the Constitution)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jack Waswa Wanyama v Punchlines Limited [2016] KEELRC 459 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Cause No 97 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/459/eng@2016-10-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.