Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause Number 848 of 2012 (transferred from Industrial Court Nairobi; re-registered at Mombasa)· [2016] KEELRC 174 (KLR)

Eric Onyango Ochelle v Keen Kleeners Limited [2016] KEELRC 174 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court (Industrial Court)
9 December 2016
2,486 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court awarded a long-serving worker service pay for nine years of work, even though most of his other claims failed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant sued the Respondent seeking declarations of continuous employment and unlawful termination, arrears of salary from July 2011, leave allowance, notice pay and severance pay totalling about Kshs. 166,014. He claimed he was employed as a casual from 10th November 2002, given a written contract in 2005, and rose to Bobcat Operator. When his Bobcat broke down in June 2011 he was directed to unskilled work in the garbage unit, protested, and was later sent to Multiple Oil Limited, working there from 4th July 2011 to 7th January 2012 without salary, which he attributed to the Respondent. The Respondent's witnesses denied any secondment, asserting the Claimant attended an interview and was employed and paid by Multiple Oil Limited, having abandoned his job. The Court rejected the secondment narrative, finding the employment relationship ended in July 2011, corroborated by the Claimant's letter of 1st August 2011 requesting service dues and a recommendation, and his return of the uniform on 16th August 2011. Arrears of salary, leave allowance, declaratory orders and notice pay were all declined. However, the Court held the Claimant completed 9 years of service which deserved recognition regardless of the manner of departure, characterising the termination as a mixture of redundancy, disciplinary dismissal and mutual separation, and awarded service pay of 15 days' salary per completed year, totalling Kshs. 57,681, with no order on costs. Judgment was delivered at Mombasa on 9th December 2016 by James Rika, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Nature of the end of employment - dismissal, redundancy or mutual separation

Holding

Termination was a mixture of redundancy elements, disciplinary dismissal and mutual separation; the job peculiar to the Claimant was rendered redundant when the Bobcat broke down

Reasoning

The Court found the Claimant's Bobcat was broken down and beyond repair, he refused to work in the garbage unit as unskilled work, and the Respondent assisted him to secure a job with Multiple Oils. The Court concluded the unavailability of the machine rendered his job redundant, but the separation also contained disciplinary and mutual elements. Regardless of the characterisation, his completed years of service deserved recognition through service pay at 15 days' salary per year for 9 years.

p. 5
02

Whether the Claimant was seconded to Multiple Oils

Holding

Not seconded; he was employed by Multiple Oil Limited after an interview on 4th July 2011, and the employment relationship with the Respondent ended in July 2011

Reasoning

Munene of Multiple Oil testified the Claimant attended an interview on 4th July 2011 and was employed and paid weekly by Multiple Oils, whose wage records were accepted as genuine. The Claimant requested service dues and a letter of recommendation from the Respondent, inconsistent with continued employment. He did not demand salary from the Respondent between July 2011 and January 2012. The Court therefore rejected the secondment narrative.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee's completed years of service ought to be recognized by the employer with service pay regardless of the manner of departure
  • Facilitating an employee's move to another company does not constitute secondment where the former employer ceases to shoulder employment obligations

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant service pay at Kshs. 57,681
  2. 2.No order on costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act 2007 referenced in submissions)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Eric Onyango Ochelle v Keen Kleeners Limited [2016] KEELRC 174 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Cause Number 848 of 2012 (transferred from Industrial Court Nairobi; re-registered at Mombasa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/174/eng@2016-12-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.