Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedJudicial Review (Motion) filed 19th July 2016 re ELRC Petition No. 49 of 2012· [2016] KEELRC 54 (KLR)

Republic v Attorney General & another Ex Parte Kariuki Kingari Murebu & 8 others [2016] KEELRC 54 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 October 2016
1,577 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ordered the Ministry of Defence to pay Kshs.82.8 million to a deceased pilot's estate, confirming that proper paperwork forces government to pay court judgments.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The ex parte applicants, the Estate of Capt. Kariuki Kingaru and eight others, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 19th July 2016 seeking an order of mandamus to compel the Principal Secretary of the Ministry of Defence to pay Kshs.72,820,868.00, being the decretal sum and taxed costs arising from judgment in their favour in ELRC Petition No. 49 of 2012 against the Attorney General. Judgment had been entered on 22nd October 2014, and the applicants obtained the decree, certificate of taxation and certificate of order against the Government, serving them on the Solicitor General on 8th July 2015. The respondent, through a replying affidavit of Yvonne Kerubo Kirui, asserted it was never served with notice of the ex parte proceedings and had filed Civil Application No. 105 of 2015 in the Court of Appeal seeking to file an appeal out of time, and asked that the motion be stayed pending that ruling. The court held that the applicants had complied with the elaborate statutory procedure in section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act, that no stay of the judgment was in place, and that the intended appeal was merely anticipatory. Applying the Nassir Mwandihi decision, the court held the Accounting Officer is under a statutory duty to satisfy court judgments against the Government. Mandamus was issued compelling payment of the decretal sum with costs and interest.

Key legal issues

#
01

Compliance with section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act as a prerequisite for mandamus

Holding

The applicants had complied with the elaborate statutory procedure by obtaining the decree, certificate of taxation and certificate of order against the Government and serving them on the Solicitor General

Reasoning

The court found that judgment was entered on 22nd October 2014; certificates of taxation and order against the Government were issued on 8th July 2015; the respondent's office received the demand letter on 29th July 2015; and no payment or attempt to set aside the judgment followed. The procedure under section 21 gives the Government adequate notice but is not a means of escaping its statutory obligation to satisfy decrees.

p. 3
02

Whether the pending Court of Appeal application justified a stay

Holding

No stay was warranted because there was no stay of the judgment in place and the intended appeal was only prospective

Reasoning

The respondent's Civil Application No. 105 of 2015 sought only extension of time to serve a Notice of Appeal out of time. Its ruling was futuristic and anticipatory; no order had suspended payment under section 21(3), and the respondent had not moved to set aside the judgment since 2014.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • While execution proceedings are not available against the Government, the Accounting Officer is under a statutory duty to satisfy a judgment made by the court against the Government department

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of mandamus directed at the Respondents compelling them to pay the ex parte Applicants Kshs.82,820,868.00 together with costs and interests, being the decretal sum arising out of ELRC Petition No. 49 of 2012 (Estate of Capt. Kingaru & 8 Others v the Attorney General)

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Government Proceedings Actsection 21(1)
  • Government Proceedings Actsection 21(3)
  • Government Proceedings Actsection 21(4)

Cases cited (1)

  • Republic v Permanent Secretary Office Of The President Ministry Of Internal Security & another Ex-Parte Nassir Mwandihi
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction of the ELRC under the Government Proceedings Act, section 21

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Attorney General & another Ex Parte Kariuki Kingari Murebu & 8 others [2016] KEELRC 54 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Judicial Review (Motion) filed 19th July 2016 re ELRC Petition No. 49 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2016/54/eng@2016-10-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.