Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCStruck OutIndustrial Cause (Memorandum of Claim dated 3rd March 2014)· [2015] KEELRC 1542 (KLR)

Kenya Union of Sugar Plantation & Allied Workers v Sony Sugar Company Ltd [2015] KEELRC 1542 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
20 February 2015
2,267 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Industrial Court struck out a union's claim for three dismissed workers because it was filed years past the legal deadline.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant trade union filed a Memorandum of Claim on 14th March 2014 seeking to overturn the termination of three grievants employed between 1992 and 2003 and terminated between 2007 and 2008, and to obtain their reinstatement without loss of benefits, plus costs. The respondent filed a preliminary objection on two grounds: that the claim was statutorily barred under Section 4 of the Limitation of Actions Act and Section 90 of the Employment Act, and that joining three grievants terminated on different dates and grounds was a misjoinder. Counsel for the respondent argued that neither the Limitation of Actions Act nor Section 90 permits extension of time, that conciliation does not suspend limitation, and that the recognition agreement does not oust limitation. Counsel for the claimant conceded the claim was out of time but argued the dispute process had been started in time under the recognition agreement, and relied on prior Industrial Court causes where multi-grievant claims had been allowed to proceed. The court, per Maureen Onyango J, held that the 1st and 3rd grievants' claims fell under the six-year contractual limitation period and the 2nd grievant's under the three-year period in Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007, and calculated that even the latest deadline (29th August 2013) had passed by the date of filing. Applying Divecon Ltd v Samani, the court found it had no jurisdiction, struck out the suit, declined to determine the misjoinder limb, and ordered each party to meet its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Limitation of employment claims filed by a trade union

Holding

The claim filed on 14th March 2014 was out of time for all three grievants - under the 6-year contractual limitation for the 1st and 3rd grievants and the 3-year period under Section 90 of the Employment Act for the 2nd grievant - and the court is bound by the mandatory provisions

Reasoning

The court identified the applicable limitation periods: six years in contract under Section 4 of the Limitation of Actions Act for terminations predating the Employment Act 2007 (2nd June 2008), and three years under Section 90 for terminations after it came into force. Union-filed disputes also had to be reported to the Minister within 28 days (Trade Disputes Act) or 90 days (Labour Relations Act). Conciliation does not suspend limitation, and the recognition agreement does not oust limitation. The claim, filed 14th March 2014, exceeded even the latest filing deadline (29th August 2013).

p. 5
02

Misjoinder of grievants terminated on different dates and grounds

Holding

Not determined, having become unnecessary once the suit was struck out

Reasoning

Although the respondent objected that joining three grievants terminated on different dates and on different grounds amounted to misjoinder, the court held that once it struck out the suit on limitation grounds, it did not need to address the misjoinder limb of the preliminary objection.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A court has no power to entertain an action founded on contract filed beyond the six-year limitation period, nor to extend time where the statute provides no such discretion
  • Neither a recognition agreement nor the Trade Disputes Act ousts the limitation period once a dispute has been filed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claim is struck out for want of jurisdiction as it was filed out of time
  2. 2.Each party shall meet its own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 4(1)(a)
  • Employment Act 2007Section 90
  • Trade Disputes ActSections 4(1), 4(2), 4(4)
  • Labour Relations ActSections 62(1), 62(3), 69, 73(1)

Cases cited (16)

  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd -Vs- West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] E.A. 696
  • Peter Musembi -Vs- Barclays Bank of Kenya Ltd
    Indus Cause No. 1686/11
  • Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd -Vs- Mutava Nzanu Nguu
    NKR HCCA No. 65/05
  • Timothy M. Mukalo -Vs- Reuben Alubale Shiramba & 3 Others
    Nrb HC. Misc. App No. 696/04 [2005] eKLR
  • Aggrey Amugune Akwiyanga -Vs- Inderpal Singh (K) Ltd
    Nrb HCCA No. 367/07
  • Julius Momanyi Ndege -Vs- Town Council of Keroka & Anor
    [2009] eKLR
  • Ayub Asamba -Vs- Telkom Kenya Ltd
    Indus Cause No. 164(N) of 2009
  • Rama Krishnarao -Vs- Saj Ceramics Ltd
    Indus Cause No. 2138 of 2012
  • Maria Machocho -Vs- Total Kenya Ltd
    Indus Misc. App No. 2 of 2012 [2013] eKLR
  • Ngari & Anor -Vs- Odero
    Civil Appeal No. 233/98 [1998] LLR 823 (CAK)
  • Mbithi -Vs- Municipal Council of Mombasa & Anor
    Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1992 at Nairobi [1992] LLR 2235 (CAK)
  • Humphrey Nyagoe Makori -Vs- Kenya Airports Authority
    Misc. App. No. 6/12
  • Joseph Mbasi Muthama V British American Tobacco Ltd
    Cause Nos. 857, 858 and 859 of 2010
  • Divecon Ltd V Samani
    [1995 - 1998] 1 EA 48
  • West Kenya Company and Kenya Union of Sugar Plantation and Allied Workers
    Cause No. 183 of 2010
  • Kenya Union of Plantation and Allied Workers and Sony Sugar Ltd
    Cause No. 345(N) of 2009
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction under the Industrial Court; objections based on Section 4 of the Limitation of Actions Act and Section 90 of the Employment Act, with the Trade Disputes Act and Labour Relations Act governing union-filed disputes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Union of Sugar Plantation & Allied Workers v Sony Sugar Company Ltd [2015] KEELRC 1542 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Industrial Cause (Memorandum of Claim dated 3rd March 2014). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/1542/eng@2015-02-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.