Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNairobi HCCC No. 370/2013 (transferred to Industrial Court)· [2015] KEELRC 1484 (KLR)

National Bank of Kenya Limited v Leonard Gethoi Kamweti [2015] KEELRC 1484 (KLR)

Industrial Court (Employment and Labour Relations Court)
5 February 2015
995 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court ruled you cannot re-argue a striking-out application already decided by the High Court — the proper route was an appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicants filed a preliminary objection dated 14 January 2015 seeking to strike out the suit on the ground that Nairobi HCCC No. 370/2013 had been instituted before a court without jurisdiction, rendering the High Court's subsequent transfer of the matter to the Industrial Court (Employment and Labour Relations Court) an annuity ab initio. The suit had earlier been before Hon. Lady Justice Ougo, who by ruling dated 24 October 2014 declined to strike it out and instead transferred it to the Industrial Court in the interest of justice. The Claimants opposed the objection, arguing it was res judicata since the identical striking-out prayer had been raised and rejected before the High Court, that the Applicants' remedy was an appeal, and that the two courts are of equal status so this Court could not sit in judgment over a High Court decision. Hon. Lady Justice Hellen Wasilwa framed two issues: whether the objection was res judicata, and whether the High Court could transfer a matter to the Employment and Labour Relations Court. On the first, the court held the objection res judicata, the same issue having been conclusively determined by a competent court of the same status, with appeal as the proper remedy. On the second, the court applied the Court of Appeal's decision in Prof Daniel N. Mugendi v Kenyatta University, which authorises mutual transfers among the High Court, the Industrial Court and the Environment and Land Court. The preliminary objection was dismissed and the court directed that the hearing proceed on merit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Res judicata regarding the preliminary objection

Holding

The objection is res judicata because the same striking-out issue was raised and determined by Hon. Lady Justice Ougo, who declined to strike out the suit and transferred it.

Reasoning

The striking-out issue had been raised and conclusively determined by Hon. Lady Justice Ougo in her ruling of 24.10.2014. Entertaining the same objection would amount to this Court sitting on appeal against a High Court decision, yet both courts enjoy the same status. The proper remedy was an appeal, which the Applicants did not pursue; accordingly the objection could not be entertained.

p. 2
02

Validity of the High Court's transfer of the suit to the Industrial Court

Holding

The High Court properly transferred the matter; transfers between the High Court and courts of equal status are lawful per Mugendi v Kenyatta University, so the suit was not an annuity ab initio.

Reasoning

Relying on the Court of Appeal's decision in Prof Daniel N. Mugendi v Kenyatta University, the court held that the High Court, the Industrial Court and the Environment and Land Court share equal status and should effect transfers among themselves in the interest of justice, pending public familiarity with the correct forum. The transfer order was therefore valid and the suit could proceed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An issue already determined by a competent court of the same status cannot be re-litigated by way of a fresh preliminary objection; the remedy is appeal.
  • The High Court, the Industrial Court (Employment and Labour Relations Court) and the Environment and Land Court, being of equal status, may transfer matters among themselves.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Preliminary Objection dated 14/1/2015 is dismissed
  2. 2.Hearing to proceed on merit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 165(5)(b)

Cases cited (1)

  • Prof Daniel N. Mugendi – vs- Kenyatta University, Benson I. Wairegi, Eliud Mathiu & Prof Oliver M. Mugenda
    C.A No. 6/2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court following transfer from the High Court; Article 165(5)(b) of the Constitution as discussed in Mugendi v Kenyatta University

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "National Bank of Kenya Limited v Leonard Gethoi Kamweti [2015] KEELRC 1484 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Nairobi HCCC No. 370/2013 (transferred to Industrial Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/1484/eng@2015-02-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.