Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2015] KEELRC 1454 (KLR)

Keneddy Michira Mangerere v Sentido Neptune Paradise Resort [2015] KEELRC 1454 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 February 2015
2,018 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that years of rolling short contracts made a security guard a permanent employee, and firing him after he demanded his dues was unfair.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed by the respondent from 2006 first as a casual security guard and later on successive fixed-term contracts from October 2010 to April 2013, sued for Ksh.465,832 in terminal dues and compensation for unlawful termination. He claimed entitlements under a CBA between his union KUDHEIHA and the respondent's employers' organization, including permanent status after three months' continuous service, three months' termination notice, housing allowance, uniform, leave travelling allowance and gratuity. His last fixed-term contract was terminated by seven days' notice on grounds of low business; he then worked casually for nine days before being dismissed after serving a demand letter through Kituo Cha Sheria for dues accrued between 2006 and 2010. The respondent denied liability, asserting lawful notice, payment of all dues, and that the claimant was not a union member before September 2010 and later deserted. The court held that the continuous fixed-term contracts exceeding one year were designed to evade permanent employment contrary to Clause 19 of the CBA, and under Section 37 of the Employment Act converted the claimant's terms to permanent employment. The termination was held to be an unfair redundancy (Section 40 procedure not followed) without the requisite two months' notice, and the summary dismissal after the demand letter was unfair under Section 46. The court awarded 12 months' salary as compensation (Ksh.108,792) and one month's salary in lieu of notice (Ksh.9,066), but dismissed claims for house allowance, uniform allowance and leave pay as time barred, and service pay because the claimant was an NSSF member. Judgment of Ksh.117,858 plus costs and interest was entered for the claimant on 13 February 2015.

Key legal issues

#
01

Status of the claimant's employment (casual vs permanent)

Holding

The court declared and converted the claimant's terms of service to permanent employment under Section 37, finding he served continuously from January 2009 to 9/5/2013 and that the successive seasonal contracts were designed to evade permanence contrary to Clause 19 of the CBA.

Reasoning

Clause 19 of the CBA permitted seasonal contracts only where they did not exceed one year and subjected them to Section 35(1)(c) of the Employment Act. The claimant served continuous fixed-term contracts from October 2010 to April 2013, exceeding one year, and had served continuously as a casual from January 2009. The court held the seasonal contracts were a device to deny permanent employee benefits and were of no consequence, and invoked Section 37 to convert the terms of service to permanent employment.

p. 3
02

Whether the termination was unlawful and unfair

Holding

Yes. The termination amounted to an unfair redundancy without compliance with Section 40, and the summary dismissal after the demand letter was unfair under Section 46.

Reasoning

The stated reason for non-renewal was low business, equivalent to redundancy, but the Section 40 redundancy procedure was not followed. The claimant was also entitled to at least two months' notice under Clauses 9 and 19 of the CBA and Section 35(1)(c) of the Act, which was not given. Further, the claimant was dismissed after serving a demand letter enforcing accrued dues, which is unfair under Section 46. The court found no valid termination since services continued on casual basis.

p. 3
03

Entitlement to reliefs

Holding

Compensation of 12 months' salary and one month's pay in lieu of notice awarded; house allowance, uniform allowance, leave pay and service pay refused.

Reasoning

Having found unfair termination, the court awarded 12 months' salary as compensation and one month's salary in lieu of notice. Claims tied to the 2006-2010 casual period were statute-barred under the three-year limitation period, and service pay was barred because the claimant was an NSSF member whose employer remitted contributions monthly, service pay being inapplicable to such employees.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Continuous service on consecutive fixed term/seasonal contracts exceeding one year, deployed to avoid permanent employment, is an abuse and the employee is deemed permanent under Sections 35 and 37 of the Employment Act
  • Termination of an employee for commencing legal proceedings to enforce a legal right is unfair under Section 46 of the Employment Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the termination of the claimant's employment was unlawful and wrongful
  2. 2.Conversion of the claimant's terms of service to that of a permanent employee under Section 37 of the Employment Act
  3. 3.Award of Ksh.108,792 being 12 months' salary as compensation for unfair termination
  4. 4.Award of Ksh.9,066 being one month's salary in lieu of notice
  5. 5.Judgment entered for the claimant for Ksh.117,858 plus costs and interest
  6. 6.Dismissal of prayers for house allowance, uniform allowance and leave pay as time barred
  7. 7.Dismissal of the prayer for service pay as the claimant was an NSSF member with monthly remittances

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 35(1)(c)
  • Employment ActSection 37
  • Employment ActSection 40
  • Employment ActSection 46
  • Labour Institutions ActNot specified
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement (KUDHEIHA and Employers' Organization) 2012-2013Clauses 9 and 19
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act and Labour Institutions Act (as pleaded basis of the suit)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Keneddy Michira Mangerere v Sentido Neptune Paradise Resort [2015] KEELRC 1454 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/1454/eng@2015-02-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.