Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause Number 233 of 2014· [2015] KEELRC 1306 (KLR)

Justus Katana Charo v Ready Consultancy Company Limited [2015] KEELRC 1306 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya at Mombasa
20 March 2015
1,975 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Even when an employee quits on their own, Kenyan employers must still pay accrued annual leave and service pay if they cannot prove otherwise.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed from July 2009 as Machine Maintenance Personnel at a daily wage of Kshs. 471 in a triangular outsourcing relationship with Kitui Flour Mills, alleged that his contract was unfairly and unlawfully terminated on 6th January 2014 in retaliation for his having filed a work injury compensation claim in the Chief Magistrate's Court at Mombasa. He sought declarations of permanent employment and unlawful termination, notice pay, annual leave arrears, gratuity and 12 months' compensation for unfair termination. The Respondent denied effecting any termination, contending the Claimant absconded and left employment voluntarily, and that his injury claim was being handled by its insurers. The HR Manager, Gloria Endekwa, testified the Claimant continued working after filing his claim and that the Respondent facilitated his treatment and continued his pay during sick-off. The Court found her evidence convincing and held that termination was not at the instance of the Respondent; the Claimant simply never presented himself back at the workplace and was not locked out. The claims for notice pay and compensation for unfair termination were rejected, and the Court declined to declare the Claimant a permanent employee, finding his status as a regular employee was not in issue. However, the Court held that terminal benefits cannot be denied regardless of the manner of termination, and, absent any evidence of leave taken or N.S.S.F. subscription, awarded annual leave pay of Kshs. 49,455 and service pay of Kshs. 35,325 under Section 35 of the Employment Act, payable within 30 days. No order was made on costs and interest.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Respondent terminated the Claimant's employment

Holding

The Respondent did not terminate the contract; the Claimant left employment on his own volition

Reasoning

The Court credited the evidence of the HR Manager, Ms Endekwa, that the Claimant continued working after filing his injury claim, was photographed by insurance officers in the ordinary processing of the claim, and that the Respondent facilitated his treatment with sick-off days and continued pay. No act of termination was attributed to the employer; the Claimant never presented himself back at the workplace and was not locked out.

p. 3
02

Entitlement to annual leave pay

Holding

The Claimant, a regular employee, was entitled to annual leave pay at a minimum of 21 working days per year; awarded Kshs. 49,455 for 5 years

Reasoning

As a regular employee the Claimant was entitled to a minimum of 21 working days' annual leave with full pay. The Respondent produced no evidence that the leave was utilized in full or in bits, only a bare assertion in submissions. The Court computed 5 years x 21 days = 105 days at the daily rate of Kshs. 471.

p. 3
03

Entitlement to service pay

Holding

Service pay awarded at 15 days' salary per completed year of service under Section 35 of the Employment Act, totalling Kshs. 35,325

Reasoning

The Respondent adduced no evidence of any social security plan at the workplace or subscription of the Claimant to the N.S.S.F. Absent such evidence, the statutory entitlement to service pay under Section 35 arose, computed at a minimum of 15 days' salary for each of the 5 complete years of service.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee cannot be denied terminal benefits regardless of the manner of termination
  • Where an employer claims an employee utilized annual leave, the burden lies on the employer to supply evidence of leave taken
  • Service pay accrues under Section 35 of the Employment Act where there is no evidence the employee was subscribed to a social security scheme

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant annual leave pay of Kshs. 49,455 and service pay of Kshs. 35,325, total Kshs. 84,780, to be paid within 30 days of delivery of the Award
  2. 2.No order on costs and interest

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 45
  • Employment ActSection 35
  • Industrial Court [Procedure] Rules 2010Rule 27[1][a]
Jurisdiction invoked
Industrial Court [Procedure] Rules 2010, Rule 27[1][a]; disputes under the Employment Act 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Justus Katana Charo v Ready Consultancy Company Limited [2015] KEELRC 1306 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Cause Number 233 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/1306/eng@2015-03-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.