Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedCause No 68 of 2014· [2015] KEELRC 1144 (KLR)

Reuben Lucheleli Shikuri v Eldoret Packers Limited [2015] KEELRC 1144 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
24 April 2015
887 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer lost its bid to delay paying an employee's award because its unsigned Notice of Appeal meant no real appeal existed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru on the Respondent's Notice of Motion filed on 11 March 2015 seeking a temporary stay of execution and a stay of execution pending appeal from the Court's judgment of 6 March 2015, which had awarded the Claimant accrued leave and underpayments totalling Kshs 385,514/-. The Respondent, through Mr. Makuto, argued that the Claimant was no longer in its employment and would be unable to refund the decretal sum if the intended appeal succeeded, and offered to furnish security. The Claimant, through Ms. Kerubo, opposed the motion, contending that no substantial loss had been demonstrated and that the annexed Notice of Appeal was improperly lodged and unsigned. The Court perused the record and found there was no Notice of Appeal on record: the document annexed to the supporting affidavit was unsigned by the Respondent's advocate and not endorsed by the Deputy Registrar, and the Court doubted whether a Notice of Appeal could properly be lodged as an affidavit annexure. Holding that without a formally lodged Notice of Appeal there is no pending appeal and the Court has no power to grant stay, the Court nonetheless considered the substantial loss test. It held that the mere possibility that a decree holder may be unable to refund the decretal sum is not, without more, a good reason for stay, endorsing dicta of Emukule J and Odunga J. The Respondent failed to demonstrate the loss it would suffer, and the Claimant showed alternative employment through an unchallenged pay slip. The motion was dismissed with costs to the Claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a valid Notice of Appeal existed to found an application for stay pending appeal

Holding

No valid Notice of Appeal was on record; the annexure was unsigned and not endorsed by the Deputy Registrar, and a Notice of Appeal cannot be lodged as an annexure to an affidavit

Reasoning

The Court perused the record and found the document referenced as Notice of Appeal was not signed by the Respondent's advocate nor endorsed by the Deputy Registrar. The Court held that such a document is no notice of appeal, and doubted whether a primary document like a Notice of Appeal can be lodged as an annexure to an affidavit. Without a formally lodged Notice of Appeal there is no pending appeal and no power to grant stay.

p. 2
02

Whether the Respondent demonstrated substantial loss sufficient for a stay pending appeal

Holding

The Respondent failed to demonstrate substantial loss; mere inability of the decree holder to refund the decretal sum is not sufficient

Reasoning

The Respondent argued it would suffer irreparable loss because the Claimant, no longer in its employment, might be unable to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeded. The Court held this is not a good enough reason without more, endorsing Emukule J's dictum that stay will not be granted merely because the decree holder is a pauper. The Claimant had demonstrated alternative employment through an unchallenged pay slip, and the Respondent did not show the damages it would suffer.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where there is no pending appeal deciphered from a formally lodged Notice of Appeal, the court has no power to grant stay of execution
  • Inability of the decree holder to refund the decretal sum is not, without more, a good reason to grant stay of execution pending appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent's motion for stay of execution pending appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the motion to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Cases cited (2)

  • Cosmas Kipkoech Sigei v Madrugada Ltd & Anr
    (2010) eKLR
  • Republic v The Commissioner for Investigations and Enforcement ex parte Wananchi Group Kenya Ltd
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent power of the Employment and Labour Relations Court to grant stay of execution pending appeal; no specific provision cited in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Reuben Lucheleli Shikuri v Eldoret Packers Limited [2015] KEELRC 1144 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Cause No 68 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/1144/eng@2015-04-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.