Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedCause No. 22 of 2015· [2015] KEELRC 910 (KLR)

Cyprian Nyachae Monani v Metric Inn Company Limited [2015] KEELRC 910 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
19 May 2015
196 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employment court can turn an out-of-court settlement into an enforceable judgment, but only after checking it is fair and lawful.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Industrial Court cause, filed at Mombasa on 26th January 2015 by Cyprian Nyachae Monani against Metric Inn Company Limited, concerned an unfair and unlawful termination of employment. The respondent did not file a Statement of Response. The matter came up for mention on 19th May 2015, when the advocates for both parties informed the court that the parties had agreed out of court and requested the court to record the settlement on the following terms: judgment to be entered for the claimant in the sum of Kshs 32,100; costs of Kshs 25,000; and payment within 45 days. Rika J examined the proposed terms and expressed satisfaction that they were fair, adequate, regular and made in accordance with the law. The court thereupon ordered that an award be entered in terms of the parties' proposal, adopting the consent settlement as its judgment and award. The award was dated and delivered at Mombasa on 19th May 2015. The brief is a consent-award record: no issues of evidence or law were tried, no authority was cited, and no relief was refused. The disposition lies wholly in the recorded settlement terms and the order adopting them.

Key legal issues

#
01

Recording of settlement terms as an award

Holding

The court recorded the parties' out-of-court settlement and entered judgment for the Claimant in the agreed terms of Kshs 32,100 plus costs of Kshs 25,000, payable within 45 days, having satisfied itself that the settlement was fair, adequate, regular and lawful

Reasoning

The parties' advocates informed the court at mention that they had agreed out of court and asked the court to record the settlement. The respondent had not filed a Statement of Response. The court scrutinised the proposed terms, found them fair, adequate, regular and made in accordance with the law, and adopted them by order as the award of the court.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • A court may record and enter judgment in terms of an out-of-court settlement where it is satisfied the terms are fair, adequate, regular and made in accordance with the law

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Award is entered in terms of the Parties' proposal above, namely: (a) Judgment entered for the Claimant for Kshs 32,100; (b) Costs of Kshs 25,000; (c) Payment within 45 days
Jurisdiction invoked
Industrial Court jurisdiction over the unfair and unlawful termination dispute (Employment and Labour Relations Court, Cause No. 22 of 2015)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Cyprian Nyachae Monani v Metric Inn Company Limited [2015] KEELRC 910 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Cause No. 22 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/910/eng@2015-05-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.