Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (Memorandum of Claim dated and filed 15th August 2013)· [2015] KEELRC 866 (KLR)

Kenya National Union of Nurses v Attorney General [2015] KEELRC 866 (KLR)

Industrial Court (Employment and Labour Relations Court)
13 March 2015
1,769 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled a nurse dismissed while appealing his conviction was unfairly terminated, capping his compensation at 12 months' salary.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The National Union of Nurses, a registered trade union with a recognition agreement covering the grievant Peter Munywoki, sued the Attorney General on behalf of the Public Service Commission and the Ministry of Health over the dismissal of the grievant, a registered nurse employed since 2nd January 1988. After a patient alleged rape in March 2009, the grievant was convicted on 8th April 2010 and sentenced to 17 years' imprisonment, and was dismissed on 22nd February 2012 while his appeal was pending. His conviction was quashed and sentence set aside on 19th March 2012, but his application for review of the dismissal was disallowed on 26th March 2013. The union sought declarations that the dismissal was unlawful under Section 25 of the Service Commission Act and the Employment Act, plus notice pay, maximum compensation and general damages totalling Kshs 13,267,775. The respondent denied unfairness, asserting gross misconduct on a balance of probabilities. The court found the respondent had adduced no evidence, only mere denials, and that the dismissal violated the Service Commission Act since the grievant was dismissed while his appeal was pending. It declared the termination unfair, awarded one month's notice pay (Kshs 83,445) and maximum compensation of 12 months' salary (Kshs 1,001,340), but refused general damages for 11 years' salary to retirement, holding that Section 49 of the Employment Act caps compensation at 12 months. Costs and interest from the date of judgment were awarded to the claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Lawfulness of dismissal while criminal appeal was pending and after acquittal

Holding

The dismissal was unfair and unlawful - it violated Section 25(3) of the Service Commission Act and the Employment Act, as the grievant was dismissed while his appeal was pending and the respondent adduced no evidence of compliance with disciplinary procedure

Reasoning

The respondent filed only a Reply with mere denials and adduced no evidence to controvert the claim. There was no proof of compliance with disciplinary procedure under the Service Commission Act or the Employment Act. The statutory scheme required that a public officer not be dismissed unless convicted, and the grievant's conviction had been quashed on appeal before his review application was rejected.

p. 2
02

Entitlement to general damages equivalent to salary for years remaining to retirement

Holding

Refused - the Employment Act caps compensation at 12 months' gross salary; general damages are only available for separate wrongs

Reasoning

The court held that remedies for unfair termination are now statutorily defined in Section 49 of the Employment Act. Awards based on years remaining to retirement apply only to permanent incapacity cases. An aggrieved employee must mitigate and move on; termination does not render an employee incapable of earning a living. The common law position to the contrary is displaced by the statute.

p. 4
03

Notice pay

Holding

One month's salary in lieu of notice awarded under the Employment Act, using Kshs 83,445 as the adopted final gross salary

Reasoning

The claimant did not prove a contractual entitlement to three months' notice; the Code of Regulations refers notice to the officer's letter of appointment, which was silent. Although the last salary was not pleaded or evidenced by payslips, the respondent did not object to the figure of Kshs 83,445 used in tabulation, and the court adopted it.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A public officer who has been acquitted of a criminal charge (including on appeal) cannot be dismissed or punished on the charge upon which he was acquitted, and no public officer may be dismissed before the criminal charge or appeal is concluded
  • General damages beyond the statutory remedies for unfair termination are only available for separate wrongs such as discrimination, defamation, sexual harassment or infringement of constitutional rights
  • Damages for unfair termination cannot be assessed on years remaining to retirement; permanent employment is not necessarily employment for life

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the termination of employment of the grievant was unfair
  2. 2.One month's salary in lieu of notice in the sum of Kshs 83,445 awarded
  3. 3.Maximum compensation of 12 months' salary in the sum of Kshs 1,001,340 awarded
  4. 4.Prayer for general damages based on 11 years' salary dismissed
  5. 5.Costs of the case awarded to the claimant
  6. 6.Decretal sum to attract interest at court rates from date of judgment

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Service Commission Act (Cap 185)Section 25(2); Section 25(3)
  • Employment ActSection 49
  • Industrial Court Act
  • Code of Regulations

Cases cited (12)

  • Michael Kiguma Maina V Kenya Police Service & 2 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Fredrick Were V M K. Jeffrey's Haulier
    [2013] eKLR
  • Joseph Sitati V Kenya Ports Authority
    [2010] eKLR
  • Universities Academic Staff Union V Masinde Muliro University
    Cause No. 379 of 2010 (unreported)
  • Raphael Juma Juma V Armed Forces Canteen Organization
    Cause No. 1070 of 2012
  • David O. Omino V Kenya Institute of Special Education
    Cause No. 453 of 2012
  • James Mugera Igati V The Public Service Commission
  • D. K. Njagi Marete V Teachers Service Commission
    Cause No. 379(N) of 2009; also cited as [2013] eKLR
  • David Mwangi Gioko & 51 Others V Nairobi Water & Sewerage Co. Ltd
    [2013] eKLR
  • Maria Kagai Ligaga V Coca Cola East Africa Limited
    Cause No. 611(N) of 2009 (unreported)
  • Menginya Salim Murgani V Kenya Revenue Authority
    HCCC No. 1139 of 2002
  • East African Airways V Knight
    [1975] E.A. 165
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction of the Industrial Court over employment and labour relations disputes (Industrial Court Act; Employment Act remedies under Section 49)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya National Union of Nurses v Attorney General [2015] KEELRC 866 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Not stated in the judgment (Memorandum of Claim dated and filed 15th August 2013). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/866/eng@2015-03-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.