Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedApplication dated 28th July 2014 (in Appeal filed 5th March 2007)· [2015] KEELRC 834 (KLR)

Nicky Njuguna & 3 others v Registrar Of Trade Unions & another [2015] KEELRC 834 (KLR)

Industrial Court (Employment and Labour Relations Court)
10 June 2015
1,669 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed the Kenya Police Union promoters' bid to force the Registrar of Trade Unions to issue their registration certificate, ruling the proper route was their existing appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicants, promoters of the Kenya Police Union, moved the Industrial Court by Notice of Motion dated 28th July 2014 under Articles 24, 41, 165(5)(h) and 162(2)(a) of the Constitution, section 12(2) of the Industrial Court Act and section 12 of the Labour Relations Act, seeking an order compelling the Registrar of Trade Unions to issue a certificate to promote the establishment of the Kenya Police Union, or alternatively that the Registrar of the Industrial Court issue the same. They relied on earlier court orders of 14th June 2013 declaring unconstitutional the law barring members of the National Police Service from forming trade unions, and on the Registrar's refusal and neglect to issue the certificate despite an application made on 15th October 2013 and reminders. The respondent opposed, arguing that its powers under section 12 of the Labour Relations Act are administrative and challengeable only by judicial review mandamus; that section 47(3)(g) of the National Police Service Act prohibiting such unions remained in force; and that the earlier ruling was the subject of Nairobi Civil Appeal No. 251 of 2014. The court held that challenges to the Registrar's decisions under section 12 lie by way of appeal to the Industrial Court under section 28(5) of the Labour Relations Act, following its decision in KEFHAU (Appeal No. 7 of 2011), rejecting the judicial review submission. However, the applicants' Memorandum of Appeal filed on 5th March 2007 already covered the refusal, and the relief sought could not be pursued piecemeal outside that appeal. Enforcement of the earlier orders was also procedurally misconceived. The application was dismissed, each party bearing their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Proper forum for challenging the Registrar of Trade Unions' exercise of administrative powers under section 12 of the Labour Relations Act

Holding

Challenges lie by way of appeal to the Industrial Court under section 28(5) of the Labour Relations Act, not judicial review

Reasoning

The court held that section 12 of the Labour Relations Act sets out steps for registration and requires the Registrar to issue a certificate or notice of rejection within 30 days. Aggrieved applicants may appeal under section 28(5) to the National Labour Court, being the Court established under the Labour Institutions Act, now the Employment and Labour Relations Court under Article 162. The court relied on its prior decision in Appeal No. 7 of 2011 (KEFHAU v Registrar of Trade Unions & KPAWU) to reject the respondent's submission that mandamus by judicial review was the proper route, noting labour relations actors have deliberately separate dispute resolution procedures.

p. 3
02

Whether the present application could circumvent the pending appeal

Holding

No - the orders sought had already been addressed in the Memorandum of Appeal dated 5th March 2007 and the application was an attempt to revisit that appeal

Reasoning

The court found that by filing the Memorandum of Appeal on 5th March 2007 the applicants had already effectively challenged the decision or lack of decision of the Registrar under section 12 of the Labour Relations Act, and the ruling of 14th June 2013/2014 dealt with the refusal to register the Kenya Police Union. Seeking a certificate to promote the proposed Union via a fresh application would revisit the appeal already on record. Piecemeal litigation of the refusal would defeat the essence of the Memorandum of Appeal. The application was therefore dismissed with each party bearing their own costs.

p. 3
03

Enforcement of the Court's orders of 14th June 2013 against the Registrar

Holding

The mode of enforcement adopted by the applicants was procedurally wrong

Reasoning

The court acknowledged there was a ruling and order of 14th June 2013 against the Registrar and that an appeal against it was pending before the Court of Appeal (Nairobi Civil Appeal No. 251 of 2014) without a stay. However, it held that enforcement of Court orders is regulated in law, and the applicants had not employed the proper procedure; the present application was therefore not a valid means of enforcing the ruling and orders.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Any aggrieved party by a decision of the Registrar of Trade Unions in the exercise of administrative roles under the Labour Relations Act appeals to the Industrial Court (Employment and Labour Relations Court), not by judicial review.
  • A refusal to register a union or issue a certificate of registration or promotion cannot be dealt with piecemeal in different applications outside the appeal already filed.
  • Execution of Court orders is regulated in law and cannot be enforced through an application of the kind brought by the applicants.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Application dated 28th July 2014 is dismissed
  2. 2.Each party shall bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 24, 41, 162(2)(a), 165(5)(h)
  • Labour Relations Act No. 14 of 2007section 12, section 28(5)
  • Industrial Court Actsection 3(1), section 12(2)
  • Labour Institutions Actestablishment of the National Labour Court
  • National Police Service Actsection 47(3)(g)

Cases cited (1)

  • Kenya Export, Floriculture, Horticulture & Allied Workers Union (KEFHAU) (represented by its promoters) v The Registrar of Trade Unions & Kenya Plantation and Agricultural Workers Union
    Appeal No. 7 of 2011
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 24, 41, 165(5)(h) and 162(2)(a) of the Constitution; section 12(2) of the Industrial Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nicky Njuguna & 3 others v Registrar Of Trade Unions & another [2015] KEELRC 834 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Application dated 28th July 2014 (in Appeal filed 5th March 2007). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/834/eng@2015-06-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.