Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 826 of 2013· [2015] KEELRC 416 (KLR)

Christopher Njoroge Kiarie v Simply Perfect Limited [2015] KEELRC 416 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
8 October 2015
948 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, a driver employed by the Respondent, sued in person for wrongful and unfair termination and failure to pay terminal benefits. He claimed he was employed on 27/9/2012 at a salary of Kshs. 18,000/=, was involved in an accident in October/November 2012, was never paid his November salary, and was dismissed in January 2013 after the Respondent refused to pay his dues, surcharging him for fuel and vehicle parts allegedly lost when the vehicle was vandalized after an accident. The Respondent, through the Federation of Kenya Employers, admitted the employment but blamed the Claimant for accidents, refusal to record statements, abandonment of the truck and of work, and denied dismissing him. The court framed two issues: whether the Claimant was terminated, and whether he was entitled to the remedies sought. It found the Respondent had dismissed him in January 2013 after refusing to pay his dues, but held the question immaterial because he had served only about three months and was on probation, and so could not complain of unfair termination under Section 45(3) of the Employment Act 2007. However, finding no proof of payment of his November and December 2012 salaries, the court awarded him Kshs. 36,000/= and ordered the Respondent to pay the costs of the suit. The broader claims for terminal benefits and unfair termination were not granted.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Claimant was terminated by the Respondent

Holding

The court found the Respondent dismissed the Claimant in January 2013 after refusing to pay his dues, but held the question immaterial given the Claimant's short service and probationary status

Reasoning

The court accepted that the Respondent dismissed the Claimant after surcharging him for fuel and vehicle parts lost when the vehicle was vandalized after the accident. However, it held that whether the Claimant was terminated or not was not material because, having served only about three months and being basically on probation, he did not fall within Section 45(3) of the Employment Act 2007 and thus could not complain of unfair termination.

p. 2
02

Whether the Claimant is entitled to remedies sought

Holding

The court awarded unpaid salary for November and December 2012 (Kshs. 36,000/=) plus costs, but refused the unfair termination claim

Reasoning

Although the Claimant could not complain of unfair termination because of his short service, there was no proof from the Respondent that his November and December 2012 salaries were paid. The court therefore awarded those two months' salary at Kshs. 18,000/= per month, totalling Kshs. 36,000/=, and awarded the costs of the suit to the Claimant.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee who has not been continuously employed for the qualifying period under Section 45(3) of the Employment Act cannot complain of unfair termination

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent to pay the Claimant salary for November and December 2012 amounting to Kshs. 36,000/=
  2. 2.The Respondent to pay the costs of this suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act 2007Section 45(3)
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act 2007 ( unfair termination and terminal benefits claim)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Christopher Njoroge Kiarie v Simply Perfect Limited [2015] KEELRC 416 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Cause No. 826 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/416/eng@2015-10-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.