Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedELRC Cause No. 1965 of 2014 (formerly HCCC No. 370 of 2014)· [2015] KEELRC 414 (KLR)

Leonard Gethoi Kamweti v National Bank of Kenya Limited & 2 others [2015] KEELRC 414 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
8 October 2015
839 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court confirmed it can review its own rulings when they rest on a mistake, striking out evidence restrictions based on an injunction that never existed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant sought review of the court's ruling of 7th May 2015, which had excluded certain evidence from an amended plaint on the basis of an injunction purportedly granted in HCCC No. 370/2014. The Applicant argued that no such injunction existed, that the High Court (Ougo J) had declined jurisdiction over the dispute and transferred it to the Employment and Labour Relations Court, and that the High Court had never confirmed the exparte orders of 16th March 2014. The Respondents opposed, contending that Ougo J's ruling did not set aside the injunction and that any dissatisfaction should be taken before the same judge. The court re-examined Ougo J's ruling and found that she had distanced herself from the merits, holding that the Industrial Court, under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Court Act, could grant preservatory and prohibitory orders and compensation, and had transferred the suit accordingly. No injunctive orders were given or extended. The court held that its earlier assumption that an injunction existed was an error it had authority to correct. It allowed the application, reviewed the ruling of 7th May 2015, and struck out the portion of paragraph 9 excluding the impugned evidence. Costs were ordered to be in the course. The judgment was read in open court on 8th October 2015 by Hon. Lady Justice Hellen Wasilwa.

Key legal issues

#
01

Effect of the High Court transfer ruling of Ougo J on the existence of an injunction

Holding

The High Court gave no injunction and did not confirm or extend the exparte orders; it declined jurisdiction and transferred the suit to the Industrial/ELRC, leaving the merits to that court.

Reasoning

On examining Ougo J's ruling, the court found she distanced herself from the merits of the application and held the Industrial Court the proper forum. No injunctive orders were given or extended. The court therefore concluded its earlier assumption that an injunction existed was an error reviewable on application.

p. 2
02

Whether the 7/5/2015 ruling excluding evidence should be reviewed

Holding

Yes; the portion of paragraph 9 of the ruling excluding certain evidence was struck out as founded on a non-existent injunction.

Reasoning

Since the purported injunction in HCCC No. 370/2014 did not exist, the basis for excluding the evidence from the amended plaint fell away. The court exercised its review power to correct the error in its own ruling of 7/5/2015.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A court has authority to correct its own error where it wrongly assumed that another court had granted injunctive orders

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The orders given in the ruling of 7/5/2015 are reviewed and the ruling corrected by striking out the portion of paragraph 9 stating that certain evidence granted in High Court case No. 1655/2014 would not be introduced in the amendment
  2. 2.Costs of the application to be in the course

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Industrial Court ActSection 12(3)
On appeal from
null
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Review jurisdiction of the court over its own orders; underlying dispute transferred from the High Court under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Leonard Gethoi Kamweti v National Bank of Kenya Limited & 2 others [2015] KEELRC 414 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). ELRC Cause No. 1965 of 2014 (formerly HCCC No. 370 of 2014). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/414/eng@2015-10-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.