Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2015] KEELRC 290 (KLR)

Timothy Njonjo Nyambura v Kabete Diary Co-op Ltd [2015] KEELRC 290 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
23 October 2015
1,412 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled an employee's dismissal unfair because he was never given a hearing, and awarded him compensation plus severance pay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed by the Respondent on 17th January 2007 as an Accounts Assistant and later promoted, was told on 30th August 2010 that the Board had terminated his contract, with the dismissal letter issued on 5th October 2010 on grounds of intimidating staff members. He received terminal benefits of Kshs.58,745.30 by cheque dated 25th March 2011 and filed a claim on 15th November 2011 seeking various unpaid dues and, by a supplementary statement of claim, twelve months' salary for wrongful dismissal among other heads. The Respondent justified the summary dismissal as gross misconduct, citing warning letters and an acknowledgement of full settlement. The court struck out the supplementary statement of claim as an unknown pleading under the Employment and Labour Relations (Procedure) Rules 2010. On the evidence, the court found the Claimant had not been given a statement of charge, show-cause letter or hearing, violating Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Employment Act, rendering the dismissal unfair. Severance pay was awarded as entitlement for four years given no proof of NSSF registration or contributions. Claims for public holiday and off-day pay and leave travelling allowance failed as unsubstantiated. The court awarded Kshs.170,833 comprising four months' salary compensation, one month's notice pay, 13 days' salary for August 2010 and leave pay, with interest at court rates from judgment and costs to the Claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Fair procedure before summary dismissal

Holding

The summary dismissal was unlawful for want of a valid reason established through fair procedure; the Claimant was entitled to notice pay and compensation under Section 49(4).

Reasoning

The Respondent did not issue a statement of charge or a show-cause letter, and the Claimant was not heard before the Board decided to dismiss him. This offended Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Employment Act. Although the Claimant did not have a clean work record, he lost his job without due process. The court awarded four months' salary as compensation under Section 49(4).

p. 4
02

Entitlement to severance pay

Holding

Claimant entitled to severance pay for four years of service in the sum of Kshs.55,000 as pleaded entitlement, no NSSF registration or remittances proved.

Reasoning

Severance pay is payable where the contract provides for it or where the employee was not registered with NSSF and no remittances were made. Once the claim is made, the onus shifts to the employer to disprove it. There was no evidence of NSSF registration or contributions, so the Claimant established entitlement.

p. 3
03

Pleading by supplementary statement of claim

Holding

A supplementary statement of claim is unknown under the Employment and Labour Relations (Procedure) Rules 2010 and was struck off as an abuse of process.

Reasoning

The Claimant should have amended the memorandum of claim instead of filing a supplementary statement of claim, a document unknown to the Rules. The court struck it off, which removed the supplementary heads of relief (12 months' salary, deductions and telephone allowance) from consideration.

p. 2
04

Unsubstantiated claims (public holidays, off days, leave travelling allowance)

Holding

These claims were dismissed for want of proof.

Reasoning

The Claimant produced no substantiation for the claims for working public holidays and off days, or for leave travelling allowance, and both were dismissed. The notice pay claim was limited to one month by statute since the dismissal issue turned on the summary dismissal finding.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The claimant bears the burden of proving particulars of claim on a balance of probability in employment claims.
  • Severance pay is payable where the employment contract so provides or where the employee was not registered with NSSF; once claimed, the onus shifts to the employer to prove otherwise.
  • Summary dismissal without a statement of charge, notice to show cause and a hearing violates Sections 41, 43, 45 and 47 of the Employment Act and is unlawful.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Kshs.100,000 compensation for unfair dismissal (4 months salary)
  2. 2.One (1) month salary in lieu of notice Kshs.25,000
  3. 3.Thirteen (13) days salary for August 2010 Kshs.10,833
  4. 4.Payment in lieu of leave Kshs.35,000
  5. 5.Total award Kshs.170,833 payable with interest at Court rates from date of judgment till payment in full
  6. 6.Respondent to pay costs of the suit
  7. 7.Supplementary statement of claim struck off as an abuse of the process of the Court

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSections 41, 43, 45, 47
  • Employment ActSection 49(4)
  • Employment and Labour Relations (Procedure) Rules 2010Not specified
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act and the Employment and Labour Relations (Procedure) Rules 2010 (provisions not expressly cited in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Timothy Njonjo Nyambura v Kabete Diary Co-op Ltd [2015] KEELRC 290 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/290/eng@2015-10-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.