Henry Nyakoe Obuba v National Police Service Commission & 3 others [2015] KEELRC 226 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Employment Court ruled a former police officer's petition was not time barred because his internal police appeal was never decided, keeping his case alive.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the petition was time barred and whether the court lacked jurisdiction
The petition was not time barred because the administrative appeal remained unresolved; the court has jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(a) and the ELRC Act.
The respondents relied on section 90 of the Employment Act, the Public Authorities Limitation Act and the Limitation of Actions Act, arguing the cause accrued on 27.05.2004 and the 2010 Constitution cannot apply retrospectively. The court found the respondents did not dispute the pleaded facts that the appeal to the Commissioner of Police was never decided, so the case was alive and the limitation provisions did not apply. Jurisdiction vested in the ELRC under Article 162(2)(a), which also bars the High Court under Article 165(5).
Whether the petitioner should have filed an ordinary action rather than a constitutional petition
No; the Constitution has collapsed procedural barriers and litigants are not faulted for adopting any available procedural option.
The respondents argued a statement of claim was required. The court held the barrier between judicial review, ordinary actions and petitions was collapsed by the 2010 Constitution, which opened avenues to access to justice and all stipulated remedies in the same proceedings. Pending evolution of universal procedure, litigants choosing among the inherited procedural options cannot be faulted; imposing such objections would introduce procedural bars to access to justice.
Legal principles established
#- A preliminary objection must consist of a pure point of law arising from the pleadings.
- An unresolved administrative appeal keeps the cause of action alive for limitation purposes.
- The 2010 Constitution collapsed the barriers between judicial review, ordinary actions and petitions; litigants may adopt any of the available procedural options.
Court orders
#- 1.Notice of preliminary objection filed on 14.10.2015 dismissed with costs
- 2.Parties invited to take directions on further steps in the petition
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 162(2)(a) and 165(5) of the Constitution as read with section 12 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2012
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Henry Nyakoe Obuba v National Police Service Commission & 3 others [2015] KEELRC 226 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Meru Judicial Review / Constitutional Petition (judgment does not state the number). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/226/eng@2015-11-20
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.