Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 1132 of 2013· [2015] KEELRC 221 (KLR)

Stella Moraa Ondari v Goodwill Photo Lab Limited [2015] KEELRC 221 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Nairobi
29 October 2015
2,053 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer who lacked written contracts and records lost an unfair termination case and had to pay notice, salary, leave and house allowance.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed in December 2011 as a photographer/saleslady, alleged she was summarily dismissed on 28th March 2012 without notice or a hearing over alleged missing stock, and that her terminal dues, written contract and certificate of service were withheld. She sought notice pay, March 2012 salary, leave pay, house allowance and 12 months' compensation. The Respondent asserted she was employed at Kshs.12,000 gross, was asked to account for missing stock worth Kshs.8,067, and instead abandoned her duties without notice, contending no leave, house allowance or compensation was due. The court held that under section 10 of the Employment Act the employer's duty to issue a written contract within two months is mandatory; the Respondent's failure, and its failure to produce pay slips and records under sections 73 and 74, left the defence bare and the Claimant's word uncontroverted. Applying section 43, the court found the employer bore the burden of proving the reason for termination and had not shown how the missing stock was established or that due process under section 41 was followed; even if the Claimant absconded, the Respondent's inaction amounted to an unfair labour practice, rendering the termination unfair. Remedies: notice pay of Kshs.18,000, March 2012 salary of Kshs.18,000, leave pay of Kshs.4,200 (ex gratia for under 12 months' service) and house allowance of Kshs.12,000 were awarded; 12 months' compensation was refused as discretionary given the 4-month tenure. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Absence of a written employment contract and employment records

Holding

The employer's statutory duty to issue a written contract under section 10 of the Employment Act is mandatory; in its absence the employee's word is taken seriously and the defence is left bare where pay slips and records under sections 73 and 74 are not produced

Reasoning

The court held that the duty to prepare a written contract lies with the employer and must be fulfilled within two months. Because the Respondent produced no contract, pay slips or statutory records, there was no documentary evidence to controvert the Claimant's testimony on salary, house allowance and leave, leaving the defence bare and the Claimant's word uncontroverted.

p. 3
02

Validity of the termination and allegations of missing stock

Holding

The termination was unfair; the employer failed to prove the reason for termination or to follow due process under section 41

Reasoning

The allegation of missing stock was serious and warranted sanction, but the Respondent did not show how the loss was noted, how blame was laid on the Claimant, or that due process allowed her to account for it. No record existed of any action taken on 28th March 2012 or afterwards, so the resultant loss of employment amounted to unfairness under sections 43 and 45.

p. 3
03

Entitlement to remedies

Holding

Notice pay, March 2012 salary, leave pay and house allowance awarded; 12 months' compensation refused as discretionary given the short tenure

Reasoning

Section 45 applied because due process was not accorded. However, compensation under section 49 is discretionary, and given only 4 months of service, it was not awarded. Notice pay, unpaid March salary, leave pay computed ex gratia for under 12 months' service, and house allowance (absent any contract term on housing) were awarded.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Employers must issue written contracts of employment within two months; failure shifts evidentiary weight to the employee's word and leaves the defence bare where records are not produced
  • Under section 43 of the Employment Act the employer bears the burden of proving the reasons for termination, failing which the termination is deemed unfair
  • Even where an employee allegedly absconds, the employer must follow due process under section 41 by issuing notices and requiring the employee to answer; inaction amounts to unfair labour practice

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Notice pay at Kshs.18,000.00
  2. 2.Salary for March 2012 at Kshs.18,000.00
  3. 3.Leave pay at Kshs.4,200.00
  4. 4.House allowance at Kshs.12,000.00
  5. 5.Each party to bear their own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Actsection 10
  • Employment Actsection 9
  • Employment Actsection 28
  • Employment Actsection 35
  • Employment Actsection 41
  • Employment Actsection 43
  • Employment Actsection 44
  • Employment Actsection 45
  • Employment Actsection 49
  • Employment Actsection 73
  • Employment Actsection 74

Cases cited (1)

  • Frederick Kariuki Kamau versus Bank of India
    Cause No. 2424 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes (Employment Act claims; unfair termination and terminal dues)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Stella Moraa Ondari v Goodwill Photo Lab Limited [2015] KEELRC 221 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Cause No. 1132 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/221/eng@2015-10-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.