Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNot stated in judgment· [2015] KEELRC 214 (KLR)

John Ashoya v High Grove Limited [2015] KEELRC 214 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
13 November 2015
843 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Mombasa court ruled an employer cannot fire a worker injured on the job without notice, a hearing, or a valid reason, awarding him Ksh 98,000.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant sued his former employer seeking terminal dues and compensation for unlawful termination. He averred that he was employed from February 2013, first as a casual labourer earning Ksh 300 per day and later as an electrician earning Ksh 9,800 monthly; that on 10.9.2014 he fell from a height while wiring a house, was treated at Jocham and Coast General hospitals, and was barred from resuming work on recovery. The respondent, though served with summons and hearing notice, filed no defence, and the suit proceeded exparte on 20.7.2015 with the claimant testifying as Cw1 and Benjamin Metika as Cw2. The court found the claimant's evidence uncontested and held that his employment was unlawfully and unfairly terminated after an industrial accident. It applied sections 41 and 45 of the Employment Act, holding that dismissal on account of an injury suffered on duty was neither founded on a valid and fair reason nor effected through the mandatory fair procedure, since only the respondent's secretary told him his employment was over and advised him to seek service pay. The court declared the termination unlawful and awarded one month's salary in lieu of notice (Ksh 9,800), Ksh 9,800 for 33.25 accrued leave days, and eight months' gross salary (Ksh 78,400) as compensation, reasoning the claimant might be unlikely to secure similar employment involving climbing for eight months due to his injuries. Judgment of Ksh 98,000 plus costs and interest was entered for the claimant on 13 November 2015 at Mombasa.

Key legal issues

#
01

Unlawful and unfair termination

Holding

The claimant's employment was unlawfully and unfairly terminated after an industrial accident, without notice, valid reason or fair procedure.

Reasoning

The suit was undefended; the claimant's evidence stood unrebutted. On a balance of probability the court found he was injured on duty on 10.9.2014 and barred from resuming work. The only reason was his injury, which was neither misconduct nor incapacity, and no section 41 procedure was followed - only the secretary told him his employment was over. Under section 45, the employer failed to prove valid reason and fair procedure, so termination was substantively and procedurally unfair.

p. 2
02

Quantum of reliefs for unfair termination

Holding

One month's salary in lieu of notice (Ksh 9,800), Ksh 9,800 for 33.25 accrued leave days, and eight months' gross salary (Ksh 78,400) as compensation for unfair termination.

Reasoning

Having declared the termination unlawful, the court awarded statutory notice pay and accrued leave for the one year and seven months served. For compensation, the court took account of the injuries sustained in the fall, reasoning that the claimant might be unable to secure similar employment involving climbing houses for about eight months, justifying the equivalent of eight months' gross salary.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer must follow the mandatory procedure under section 41 of the Employment Act - explain the reason for intended dismissal to the employee in the presence of a fellow employee or shop floor representative and allow them to be heard - before terminating on grounds of misconduct, poor performance or incapacity.
  • Under section 45 of the Employment Act, termination is unfair where the employer fails to prove it was founded on a valid and fair reason and effected through a fair procedure.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the claimant declaring termination of his employment unlawful
  2. 2.Award of Ksh 98,000 (comprising one month's salary in lieu of notice Ksh 9,800, Ksh 9,800 for 33.25 accrued leave days, and Ksh 78,400 as eight months' gross salary compensation for unlawful termination)
  3. 3.Costs of the suit to the claimant
  4. 4.Interest on the decretal sum

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 41
  • Employment ActSection 45
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and labour relations jurisdiction (employment and Labour Relations Court Act); Employment Act invoked on the merits

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "John Ashoya v High Grove Limited [2015] KEELRC 214 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2015/214/eng@2015-11-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.