Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2014] KEELRC 1351 (KLR)

Jackson Kipruto Arap Soi v Principal, Mercy Girls Secondary School, Kipkelion & Another [2014] KEELRC 1351 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
17 October 2014
781 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court voided a watchman's dismissal because the wrong person fired him, awarding maximum compensation for 14 years of service.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed as a night watchman from February 1997 at Kshs.5,998.00 basic pay plus house allowance, claimed notice pay, welfare dues, overtime, public holiday pay, gratuity, 12 months' compensation under section 49(1)(c) of the Employment Act, 2007, costs and a certificate of service, following his termination on 27.10.2011 after he received a private visitor at his workplace and handed the visitor keys to his residence. A meeting on 2.11.2011 chaired by Father David Cheruiyot resulted in the claimant being directed to leave employment, although both parties' witnesses agreed that disciplinary powers were vested in the Principal, Sister Anne Peter Anyang'. The Bishop asked the claimant to report back but he was locked out, and Father David upheld the dismissal at a meeting at the District Commissioner's office. The court found that Father David usurped the Principal's disciplinary powers and that the dismissal was null and void ab initio for lack of due process. Taking account of the long service and the claimant's legitimate expectation of continued employment, the court awarded 12 months' compensation of Kshs.87,084.00 plus one month's notice pay of Kshs.5,998.00. Claims for welfare, overtime and public holidays failed for want of evidence, and gratuity was disallowed because the claimant was an NSSF member. The court ordered payment of Kshs.93,082.00 by 1.12.2014 with interest in default, delivery of the certificate of service under section 51, and costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the termination was unfair

Holding

The dismissal by Father David, who lacked disciplinary powers vested in the Principal, was null and void ab initio and without due process; the claimant was awarded 12 months' compensation under section 49(1)(c)

Reasoning

Both parties' witnesses agreed that disciplinary powers were vested in the Principal, Sister Anne Peter Anyang', not Father David Cheruiyot, who nonetheless directed the claimant to leave employment and upheld the dismissal. The Bishop's intervention allowing the claimant to report back was defeated by the lockout. The court weighed the long service and legitimate expectation, invoking section 49(1)(c) for the maximum 12 months' compensation.

p. 2
02

Whether the claimant was entitled to notice pay, welfare, overtime, public holiday pay and gratuity

Holding

One month's notice pay of Kshs.5,998.00 awarded; welfare, overtime and public holiday claims failed for lack of evidence; gratuity disallowed because the claimant was an NSSF member

Reasoning

Notice pay flows from the unfair termination. The quantum claims for welfare, overtime and public holidays were unsupported by any evidence and so failed. Gratuity was unavailable to the claimant as a member of the National Social Security Fund. The certificate of service under section 51 of the Employment Act was ordered.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A dismissal effected by a person without disciplinary authority over the employee is null and void ab initio and constitutes lack of due process
  • An unfairly terminated long-serving employee with legitimate expectation of continued employment may be awarded 12 months' compensation under section 49(1)(c) of the Employment Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The respondent to pay the claimant Kshs.93,082.00 by 1.12.2014 failing interest at court rates to be payable thereon from the date of the judgment till full payment
  2. 2.The respondent to deliver to the claimant the certificate of service by 1.12.2014
  3. 3.The respondent to pay costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007Section 49(1)(c)
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 51
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 (employment claim)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jackson Kipruto Arap Soi v Principal, Mercy Girls Secondary School, Kipkelion & Another [2014] KEELRC 1351 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/1351/eng@2014-10-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.