Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment (Notice of Motion dated 11.3.2014)· [2014] KEELRC 502 (KLR)

Kenya County Government Workers Union v Kisumu County Assembly Public Service Board [2014] KEELRC 502 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
30 April 2014
1,951 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kisumu court stopped the County Assembly Service Board from hiring new staff until it first audited and absorbed employees already deployed from former local authorities.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Kenya County Government Workers Union, on behalf of interested parties deployed to the Kisumu County Assembly from former local authorities after the March 2013 general elections, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 11.3.2014 seeking to restrain the County Assembly Service Board from conducting interviews and recruiting staff advertised without a staff audit and rationalization, and from terminating the deployed employees. The respondents opposed, arguing they were wrongly sued as a body created under Section 12 of the County Government Act distinct from the County Government, that the interested parties were employees of the County Government and not of the Board, and that the Governors' Guidelines did not bind them. Wasilwa J framed three issues: whether the Board is part of the County Government; whether its decisions affect the County Government; and whether the orders sought were grantable. Relying on Article 176 of the Constitution, the court held that the County Assembly is part of the County Government and that the Board is part and parcel of that entity, its decisions affecting the whole County Government. The court noted the Transition Authority's advice of 24.12.2013 that recruitment be suspended pending rationalization, capacity assessment and staff matching, and found no evidence that this advice had been followed. The court granted interlocutory injunctions restraining recruitment and interviews pending rationalization, directed staff rationalization before advertising vacancies, restrained termination without due process, and awarded costs of the suit to the claimants against the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the County Assembly Public Board is part of the County Government and properly sued

Holding

Yes - the respondents are part and parcel of the County Government under Article 176(1) of the Constitution

Reasoning

Article 176(1) defines a County Government as consisting of a County Assembly and County Executive. The County Government Act decentralizes functions across various bodies. The respondents' argument that they are separate entities under Section 12 of the Act lacked force of law. The Board's decisions affect the running of the entire County Government, so it was properly before the court.

p. 3
02

Whether recruitment could proceed without staff rationalization and audit

Holding

No - the positions of deployed staff should not be disturbed before rationalization, audit and deployment as advised by the Transition Authority

Reasoning

The Transition Authority's press release of 24.12.2013 advised both levels of government to suspend external recruitment until rationalization was finalized and existing officers deployed, involving capacity assessment, review of structures, workload analysis and staff matching. There was no evidence this advice had been carried out by the respondents or the County Government of Kisumu.

p. 4
03

Whether the claimants were entitled to interim injunctive relief

Holding

Yes - injunctions issued pending hearing of the suit protecting deployed staff from recruitment and termination without due process

Reasoning

The interested parties remain staff of the County Government of Kisumu deployed to the respondents, and their positions should not be disturbed without following laid-down procedures. The court found for the applicants on the Giella v Cassman Brown principles as submitted.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A County Assembly Service Board is part and parcel of the County Government and its decisions affect the County Government

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Temporary injunction restraining respondents from carrying on with interviews, recruitment or employment of any staff to the County Assembly pending hearing and determination of the suit, before staff rationalization and deployment
  2. 2.Order directing respondents to first undertake staff rationalization of Kisumu County Assembly staff, determine existing vacancies, and advertise only positions that cannot be filled by current staff from the claimants' membership
  3. 3.Injunction restraining respondents from terminating or dismissing claimants from employment without following the law and their terms and conditions of employment
  4. 4.Respondents to bear costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Act Cap 21Sections 3A, 63(c) and (e)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 40 Rules 2, 3, 4, 8; Order 51 Rules 1, 3, 4
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Articles 47, 176(1), 176(2)
  • County Government ActSections 12, 59, 61, 62, 63, 72, 74, 75, 76
  • Transition to Devolved Government Act 2012Sections 3, 5(a)-(c), 24
  • Guidebook to GovernorsSections 6, 66

Cases cited (1)

  • Giella vs Cassman Brown
Jurisdiction invoked
Civil Procedure Act Cap 21 Sections 3A, 63(c) and (e); Order 40 and Order 51 Civil Procedure Rules 2010; County Government Act Sections 62 and 63; Constitution of Kenya

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya County Government Workers Union v Kisumu County Assembly Public Service Board [2014] KEELRC 502 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Not stated in judgment (Notice of Motion dated 11.3.2014). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/502/eng@2014-04-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.