Kenya Airways Limited v Donald Osewe Oluoch [2014] KEELRC 370 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Industrial Court allowed Kenya Airways' late employment claim because time spent suing in the wrong court doesn't count against the six-year deadline.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Retroactivity of Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007
Section 90 does not apply to a cause of action arising before the Act commenced operation in August 2008; Section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap. 22 governs, with a six-year limitation period for contract claims.
The cause of action arose on 25th June 2007 upon the Respondent's resignation in breach of a training sponsorship bond. The Employment Act 2007 only commenced in August 2008, so its three-year limitation period in Section 90 cannot apply retroactively. The applicable law is therefore the Limitation of Actions Act, whose six-year period for contract claims had arguably expired by the time of filing in August 2013.
Estoppel and jurisdiction
There can be no estoppel against an objection on jurisdiction; the court may raise jurisdiction suo moto.
The Respondent argued the Claimant was estopped from filing in the Industrial Court because it had earlier resisted transfer of the High Court suit to the Industrial Court, which was later dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The court held that jurisdiction goes to the root and cannot be conferred by conduct or waiver; a court must examine jurisdiction even suo moto and must strike out a suit where it lacks jurisdiction.
Exclusion of time spent prosecuting a suit in a court without jurisdiction
Time spent prosecuting the earlier High Court suit (HCCC No. 754 of 2009), which concerned the same parties and subject matter and was struck out for want of jurisdiction, is excluded from the computation of limitation.
Applying the principle in K.J. Tomji's treatise on limitation, the court held that time during which a plaintiff diligently and in good faith prosecutes another civil proceeding against the same defendant on the same cause of action, in a court unable to entertain it for defect of jurisdiction, is excluded. Although the claim was filed more than six years after the cause of action, the period the matter was pending at the High Court and Court of Appeal did not run. The suit was thus filed within time.
Legal principles established
#- There can be no estoppel against an objection on jurisdiction; a court must raise lack of jurisdiction suo moto and, if it lacks jurisdiction, must strike out the suit.
- Provisions of the Employment Act, 2007 (which came into operation in August 2008) cannot be applied retroactively to a cause of action arising in June 2007; the applicable limitation law is Section 4(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap. 22.
- Where a plaintiff prosecutes with due diligence, in good faith, another civil proceeding founded on the same cause of action in a court lacking jurisdiction, the time spent on that proceeding is excluded in computing limitation.
Court orders
#- 1.The preliminary objection in limine is dismissed
- 2.Costs of the preliminary objection in the cause
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Jurisdiction of the Industrial Court under the Employment Act and the court's founding statute; suit filed on 23rd August 2013
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (6)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Mugambi & another v Wangai (Civil Appeal 64 of 2020) [2026] KECA 1616 (KLR)[2026] KECA 1616 (KLR)31 Jul 2026
- Omuse v National Police Service Commission (Cause 2123 of 2017) [2024] KEELRC 1289 (KLR)[2024] KEELRC 1289 (KLR)27 May 2024applied
- Beatrice Wangui Mwihia v Barclays Bank of Kenya [2019] KEELRC 2490 (KLR)[2019] KEELRC 2490 (KLR)29 Jan 2019
- Bonface Inondi Otieno v Mehta Electricals Ltd [2016] KECA 533 (KLR)[2016] KECA 533 (KLR)27 May 2016
- Maimuna Kenyi Suleiman v Amina Ibrahim [2016] KEKC 29 (KLR)[2016] KEKC 29 (KLR)25 Apr 2016applied
- Boniface Inondi Otieno v Mehta Electrical Limited [2015] KECA 586 (KLR)[2015] KECA 586 (KLR)3 Jul 2015distinguished
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Airways Limited v Donald Osewe Oluoch [2014] KEELRC 370 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Cause No. 1155 of 2013 (Industrial Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/370/eng@2014-07-11
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.