Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNot stated in the excerpt· [2014] KEELRC 246 (KLR)

Railways and Allied Workers Union v Rift Valley Railways (K) [2014] KEELRC 246 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya (now Employment and Labour Relations Court)
19 September 2014
744 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan employer failed to stop execution of a Kshs.658,000 employment award because it never appealed or reviewed the original decision in time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Respondent in an employment dispute moved the Industrial Court by Notice of Motion dated 8th July 2014 seeking stay of execution of a decree for money pursuant to a warrant issued on 2nd July 2014, and review, setting aside or vacation of the orders of 12th June 2014 and consequential orders. The application, supported by an affidavit of Rebecca Mbithi, the company secretary, contended that the orders of 12th June 2014 directing payment of Kshs.658,000/= in unpaid salaries and gratuity were made ex parte without hearing the Respondent, were not served on the advocates on record, and that the amounts were not payable. The Respondent attributed non-attendance on 12th June 2014 to counsel's erroneous mis-diarising of the mention date. The Claimant/Respondent opposed the application, arguing the issues were res judicata: the award of Kosgei J. of 11th September 2011 had never been appealed or reviewed, and the 12th June 2014 order merely computed that award at Kshs.658,000/= in the absence of any contrary filing. The court dismissed the application with costs. It held that no appeal or review of the computed award was ever filed, that the supporting affidavit was inadmissible hearsay because the deponent had no personal knowledge of the advocates' alleged errors, and that the application was misconceived. Warrant of execution was left to stand.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether ex parte orders of 12th June 2014 should be set aside on grounds of non-service and counsel's mis-diarisation

Holding

The application was dismissed; the 12th June 2014 order merely computed the final award of 11th September 2011 in the absence of any contrary filing by the Respondent, and no appeal or review of the award was ever lodged

Reasoning

The court found that the only issue finalized on 12th June 2014 was computation of the earlier award of Kosgei J., which the court confirmed at Kshs.658,000/= in terms of the Claimant's computation since the Respondent filed nothing contrary. The Respondent never filed a notice of appeal nor applied for review since 11th September 2011, so the issues were res judicata. Moreover, the matters were raised by a company secretary without personal knowledge of the advocate's alleged errors.

p. 2
02

Admissibility of the supporting affidavit

Holding

The affidavit of Rebecca Mbithi deponing to the advocates' alleged errors was inadmissible hearsay

Reasoning

The errors of mis-diarising the mention date were allegedly committed by the advocates on record, yet the affidavit was sworn by the company secretary who had no personal knowledge of those facts. The court held that the advocate ought to have placed those facts before the court on affidavit, and that a third party's second-hand account could not be the basis of setting aside the court's order.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal against an award of the Industrial Court must be noted within 14 days from the date of the order or award, and failure to appeal or seek review renders the computed award final and executable
  • A deponent without personal knowledge of an advocate's errors cannot swear an affidavit on those matters; such evidence is inadmissible hearsay

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 8th July 2014 seeking stay of execution and setting aside of the orders of 12th June 2014 is dismissed with costs to the Claimant/Respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Original employment and labour relations jurisdiction of the Industrial Court; application under the court's rules for stay of execution, review and setting aside of orders

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Railways and Allied Workers Union v Rift Valley Railways (K) [2014] KEELRC 246 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Not stated in the excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/246/eng@2014-09-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.