Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No 1172 of 2010· [2014] KEELRC 210 (KLR)

Joyce Wambui Muraguri v Registered Trustees P.C.E.A Kikuyu Hospital [2014] KEELRC 210 (KLR)

Industrial Court (Employment and Labour Relations Court)
26 June 2014
1,988 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a suspended nurse was entitled to full salary for her entire suspension period plus notice pay because her dismissal lacked due process.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, a nursing officer employed by the Respondent since January 1992, sued for unlawful termination and unpaid salary and terminal dues. She was suspended on 23rd June 2006 over allegations of fighting with a member of the public within the hospital, and her services were terminated by a letter dated 28th March 2007 following a Board meeting on 28th December 2006. She claimed salary and house allowance for the suspension period, pay in lieu of notice, interest, general damages and costs. The Respondent defended the dismissal as gross misconduct under Section 17 of the repealed Employment Act cap 226 and contended no salary was payable during suspension. The Claimant testified she was never told the outcome of any investigation and was never summoned before the Board; the Respondent's witness admitted he did not witness the incident, could not name witnesses, and the minutes of the Board meeting were not availed. The Court held that the effective date of termination was 28th March 2007 since no termination can be retroactive, and that the Claimant was entitled to pay for the period her employment subsisted from July 2006 to March 2007, amounting to Kshs. 160,650/-. It found the grounds relied on were not provided for in Section 17 of cap 226 as justifying summary dismissal, so one month's notice was due (Kshs. 17,850/-), and, the termination having been effected without regard to natural justice, awarded one month's salary as damages, with costs to the Claimant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Lawfulness of the summary dismissal for gross misconduct under the repealed Employment Act cap 226

Holding

The grounds relied on by the Respondent did not fall within Section 17 of cap 226 and the dismissal was carried out without natural justice; the Claimant was entitled to one month's notice and one month's salary as damages

Reasoning

The Court examined Section 17 of the repealed Employment Act cap 226, which enumerates matters amounting to gross misconduct justifying summary dismissal. The conduct alleged (a fight with a member of the public) was not among the enumerated grounds. The law therefore required one month's notice. Additionally, the Claimant was never summoned before the Board and no investigation outcome was communicated, offending natural justice.

p. 3
02

Effective date of termination and entitlement to salary during suspension

Holding

The effective date of termination was 28th March 2007; the Claimant is entitled to pay from July 2006 to March 2007, totalling Kshs. 160,650/-

Reasoning

The Claimant was suspended on 23rd June 2006 and the Board's decision was communicated through a termination letter dated 28th March 2007. Doubt existed whether the letter was dispatched earlier, but services were subsisting until termination. Since no termination can be retroactive, the employment subsisted from suspension to March 2007 and pay accrued for that period, less the dues already paid for June 2006.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • No termination of employment can be made retroactively; the effective date of termination is the date the termination decision was communicated
  • An employee whose employment subsists between suspension and termination is entitled to pay for that period
  • Where the grounds relied on by the employer are not enumerated under Section 17 of the repealed Employment Act cap 226 as amounting to gross misconduct, the proper course is to give one month's notice
  • A termination carried out without regard to natural justice entitles the employee to damages of one month's salary under the pre-2007 law

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Payment of Kshs. 160,650/- being salary for the period the employment subsisted from July 2006 to March 2007
  2. 2.Payment of Kshs. 17,850/- being one month's salary in lieu of notice
  3. 3.Payment of one month's salary as damages for termination carried out without regard to natural justice
  4. 4.Costs of the suit to the Claimant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act (now repealed)Section 17
  • Employment Actcap 226
  • Interpretation and General Provisions Actcap 2

Cases cited (8)

  • Walter Ogal Anuro v Teachers Service Commission
    [2013] eKLR
  • Ezekiel Oira v Kenya Broadcasting Corporation & Another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Dalmas Ogoye v KNTC Limited
    CA No. 125 of 1996 (unreported)
  • Republic v Chief Magistrates Court & 2 Others ex parte Antonina Auma Okoth
    Misc. Civil Application No. 994 of 2004
  • Mughal v Lakmer Techs Ltd
    [2002] 1 KLR 199
  • Wanjohi v Mitchell Cotts Kenya Ltd
    [2002] 2 KLR 462
  • Barclays Bank of Kenya Ltd v Njau
    [2006] 1 KLR 93
  • Central Bank of Kenya v Nkabu
    [2002] 2 KLR 149
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction denied by the Respondent but confirmed in a Ruling dated 10th February 2012 by Judge Kosgey; the Court heard and determined the employment claim in the first instance

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joyce Wambui Muraguri v Registered Trustees P.C.E.A Kikuyu Hospital [2014] KEELRC 210 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Cause No 1172 of 2010. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/210/eng@2014-06-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.