Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause Number 423 of 2013· [2014] KEELRC 190 (KLR)

Philip Olouch Rasare v Mombasa Apparel EPZ Unit 2 [2014] KEELRC 190 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
24 October 2014
650 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court paid the worker his unpaid salary but refused compensation because he couldn't prove he was forced out.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed as a Mass Production Machinist at a monthly salary of Kshs.12,822 under a fixed-term contract running from 19th July 2013 to 15th October 2013, left employment on 8th October 2013 and claimed he was forced to go on leave for three days, after which his supervisor told him his services were no longer required. He sought salary for 14 days worked in October 2013 (Kshs.5,684), unpaid salary arrears (Kshs.1,784), and three months' salary in lieu of notice for unfair termination (Kshs.36,258). The respondent conceded the first two prayers but maintained the claimant left voluntarily after protesting a new stitching style, asked for unpaid leave to cool off, and never returned before the contract expired on 15th October 2013. Rika J found the claimant's testimony that he was forced on leave inconsistent with his own Statement of Claim and advocates' demand letter, which stated he applied for unpaid leave. The respondent's HR Officer's evidence was found believable. The court awarded the conceded amounts - a total of Kshs.7,684 payable within 14 days in full and final satisfaction of the claim - but refused notice pay or compensation for unfair termination, holding the claimant had walked out on a contract about a week from expiry. There was no order as to costs or interest.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether termination of employment was instigated by the employer

Holding

The claimant failed to show that the respondent terminated his contract; his departure was voluntary

Reasoning

The court found the claimant's evidence that he was forced to go on leave was inconsistent with his Statement of Claim and advocates' letter, both of which showed he applied for unpaid leave. The HR Officer's evidence that he protested a new stitching style and asked to cool off was found believable, and he did not return until after the contract had expired on 15th October 2013.

p. 2
02

Entitlement to salary for days worked and arrears

Holding

Awarded in full as conceded by the respondent

Reasoning

The respondent conceded the prayers for 14 days' salary for work done in October 2013 and the unpaid salary arrears. The court found these prayers uncontested and directed payment in full and final satisfaction of the claim within 14 days.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee who walks out on a fixed-term contract shortly before its expiry and claims to have been forced to leave but cannot substantiate it is not entitled to notice pay or compensation for unfair termination

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent shall, within 14 days of the delivery of the Award, pay to the Claimant a total of Kshs.7,684, for days worked in October 2013, and for arrears of salary, in full and final satisfaction of the Claim
  2. 2.No order on the costs and interest
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment causes (Industrial Court Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Philip Olouch Rasare v Mombasa Apparel EPZ Unit 2 [2014] KEELRC 190 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Cause Number 423 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/190/eng@2014-10-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.