Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 4th December, 2013 (Claim filed at the Employment and Labour Relations Court)· [2014] KEELRC 138 (KLR)

Jeremiah Mbuthia Ndirangu v Jubilee Insurance Company Limited [2014] KEELRC 138 (KLR)

Employment and Labour Relations Court
7 November 2014
1,303 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court dismissed a dismissed employee's bid to get his job back temporarily, ruling that reinstatement is a final remedy, not a stopgap one.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, Jeremiah Ndirangu, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 4th December, 2013 seeking interim reinstatement to his position as I.T Applications Analyst, pending the hearing and determination of his application and the main claim, on grounds that he was unlawfully dismissed on 1st August 2013 over unsubstantiated fraud allegations, and that the respondent had stopped servicing a loan facility with Standard Chartered Bank, exposing him to financial difficulty. The respondent opposed, asserting the claimant was suspended and faced criminal prosecution for fraud involving a false HP Elite Book laptop claim of Ksh.102,240 allegedly generated through manipulation of the company's computer systems, and inflation of his own vehicle insurance claim from Ksh.650,000 to Ksh.970,000. She contended reinstatement was not feasible under section 49 of the Employment Act, 2007 and that no prima facie case was established. Relying on Giella –vs- Cassman Brown and authorities including Alfred Nyungu Kimungui –vs- Bomas of Kenya and the East African Court of Justice decision in Mary Aliviza and Okoth Mondoh, the court held the application fell short of the interlocutory injunction criteria, noting that reinstatement is a substantive remedy not ordinarily grantable as a provisional measure. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondent on 7th November 2014.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the claimant established a prima facie case with a probability of success

Holding

He did not; the application fell short of the Giella threshold and therefore failed

Reasoning

The respondent had raised serious allegations of fraud against the claimant, including manipulation of computer data systems to generate a false insurance claim and inflation of his own vehicle claim, and faced criminal prosecution. Against these contested allegations the claimant could not demonstrate, at the interlocutory stage, a prima facie case with a probability of success as mandated in Giella -vs- Cassman Brown, nor the remaining two criteria.

p. 3
02

Whether reinstatement may issue as an interim measure

Holding

No; reinstatement is a substantive remedy to be granted upon full hearing, not as temporary relief

Reasoning

Following Rika, J in Alfred Nyungu Kimungui –vs- Bomas of Kenya, the court reasoned that the law does not contemplate reinstatement as a provisional measure. It is a remedy that should normally be granted upon the full hearing of the employer and the employee, so interim reinstatement orders were inappropriate here.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for interlocutory relief must show a prima facie case with a possibility of success, irreparable injury not compensable by damages, and if in doubt the court decides on the balance of convenience
  • Reinstatement of an employee is ordinarily a substantive remedy, not a temporary or provisional measure

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 4th December, 2013 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 49

Cases cited (4)

  • Giella –vs- Cassman Brown
    [1970] EA 358
  • Gladys Boss Shollei –vs- Judicial Service Commission
    [2013] eKLR
  • Mary Aliviza and Okoth Mondoh v. Attorney General of Kenya and Secretary General of East African Community
    Application No. 31 of 2010, EALS Law Digest – 2011 page 1
  • Alfred Nyungu Kimungui –vs- Bomas of Kenya
    [2013] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Employment and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction over employment disputes; interim relief assessed under section 49, Employment Act, 2007 and Giella principles

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jeremiah Mbuthia Ndirangu v Jubilee Insurance Company Limited [2014] KEELRC 138 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Notice of Motion dated 4th December, 2013 (Claim filed at the Employment and Labour Relations Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/138/eng@2014-11-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.