Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedEx-parte Application (Industrial Court, Mombasa) - similar to Mombasa Miscellaneous Civil Application Number 12 of 2014· [2014] KEELRC 114 (KLR)

Hawkins Wagunza Musonye v Rift Valley Railways Kenya Limited [2014] KEELRC 114 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
14 November 2014
270 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Industrial Court ruled that time spent negotiating with an employer after dismissal doesn't count toward the three-year limit for filing an employment claim.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an ex-parte application before the Industrial Court at Mombasa seeking extension of time to file a claim against Rift Valley Railways Kenya Limited. The Applicant, Musonye, was a former employee whose employment was terminated on 12th November 2009. He instructed advocates who negotiated with the employer and reached an agreement for payment of Kshs. 65,000 all-inclusive settlement, and a discharge voucher was prepared. The Applicant rejected the settlement terms, withdrew instructions from his advocates, and instructed a new law firm to pursue the dispute in court. He apprehended that the three-year limitation period under Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007 had lapsed and sought extension of time. The court noted that the facts were identical to those in Desidery Tyson Otieno Onyango's application (Mombasa Miscellaneous Civil Application Number 12 of 2014), where the same orders had been sought against the same employer. The court found the Claim was not time barred, taking into account the period of negotiations, and adopted the findings, reasoning and conclusion in the Desidery Onyango matter. It ordered that the attached Statement of Claim be deemed duly filed upon payment of the requisite court fees, and that the Claim be registered and summons issued upon payment of the requisite fees. Judgment dated and delivered at Mombasa on 14th November 2014 by James Rika, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the intended Claim, brought more than three years after termination on 12th November 2009, is barred by Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007.

Holding

The Claim is not time barred because the period of negotiations between the Applicant's former advocates and the employer is taken into account, following the court's earlier reasoning in Desidery Onyango.

Reasoning

The Applicant, like Onyango in Miscellaneous Civil Application Number 12 of 2014, was a former employee of Rift Valley Railways Kenya Limited whose services were terminated on 12th November 2009. His advocates negotiated with the employer and arrived at a settlement of Kshs. 65,000 all-inclusive, but he rejected the terms and withdrew instructions. The court found the facts identical to Onyango's and adopted that decision's findings, reasoning and conclusion, holding that the negotiation period is excluded, so the Claim is not barred.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The time spent in negotiations between an employee's advocates and the employer after termination is taken into account when assessing whether a claim filed within three years of termination is time barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Statement of Claim attached to the Application shall be deemed as duly filed upon payment of the requisite Court fees.
  2. 2.The Claim be registered and summons issued upon the payment of the requisite Court fees.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 90
Jurisdiction invoked
Industrial Court's authority to extend time under Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Hawkins Wagunza Musonye v Rift Valley Railways Kenya Limited [2014] KEELRC 114 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Ex-parte Application (Industrial Court, Mombasa) - similar to Mombasa Miscellaneous Civil Application Number 12 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2014/114/eng@2014-11-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.