Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 340 of 2012· [2013] KEELRC 625 (KLR)

Sylvester Odour Oyile v Prime Fuels (Kenya) Limited [2013] KEELRC 625 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
13 June 2013
4,263 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled an employee's 'restructuring' dismissal was unfair because his employer skipped mandatory redundancy steps, awarding him over Kshs 2 million.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, employed by the respondent from 1st November 1997 as a Maintenance Technician, rose through the ranks to Assistant Operations Manager Western Kenya Region on a final salary of Kshs.168,846 per month. On 15th September 2011 his employment was terminated on the grounds that the respondent was restructuring its business and his position was abolished, and that he had declined an alternative posting to the DRC. The respondent, despite filing a response, failed to appear at the hearing and no witness was called; the claim proceeded undefended on the claimant's sworn evidence. The court held that a termination on grounds of restructuring is a redundancy engaging the mandatory conditions precedent in section 40 of the Employment Act: notice to the labour officer, fair selection criteria, payment of leave, one month's notice or pay in lieu, and severance of not less than fifteen days' pay per completed year. The respondent complied with none of these; the restructuring was unsupported by evidence, the labour officer was not notified, and the claimant was given no hearing under section 41(2). The assertion that he refused the DRC posting was also unsupported, as he had travelled to the DRC and held a valid multiple-entry visa at termination. The court declared the termination unfair, awarded ten months' compensation, one month's notice pay, severance for 13 completed years, 56 leave days and September 2011 salary, offset by Kshs.1,190,981.00 already paid, for a balance of Kshs.2,188,366.00, plus a certificate of service within 14 days and costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Procedural fairness in termination on account of restructuring/redundancy

Holding

The respondent ignored every mandatory condition in section 40 of the Employment Act; no notification to the labour officer was shown and the claimant was not consulted, rendering the termination unfair contrary to sections 40, 41, 43 and 45 of the Act and Article 41 of the Constitution.

Reasoning

The court set out the seven mandatory steps for redundancy under section 40 and tested the respondent's conduct against each. The restructuring reason was unsupported by evidence; the labour officer was not notified; the claimant was not involved; and no hearing or representations were allowed before the decision to terminate, breaching the audi alteram partem rule embodied in section 41(2).

p. 6
02

Whether the claimant refused transfer to the DRC

Holding

The assertion that the claimant refused deployment to the DRC was unsupported; he had validly travelled to the DRC and held a valid multiple-entry visa at the time of termination, so he was available to work there.

Reasoning

The claimant's uncontroverted sworn evidence showed he travelled to the DRC on the respondent's instructions, obtained a six-month multiple-entry visa valid until 21st August 2011, and was recalled for an approved eye operation paid for by the respondent. His termination in September 2011 could not therefore rest on refusal of the DRC posting, and the respondent adduced no evidence to the contrary.

p. 6
03

Notice pay, severance, leave and salary dues

Holding

The claimant was entitled to one month's notice pay, severance at 15 days' pay per completed year for 13 years, 56 leave days, and salary for 19 days worked in September 2011, less amounts already received.

Reasoning

The court found no notice of at least one month was issued before termination despite a prior meeting. Leave days due are payable in cash. Severance was computed on 13 complete years of service at 15 days' pay per year, and the admitted payment of Kshs.1,190,981.00 was offset against the total award.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer who terminates on grounds of redundancy/restructuring must comply with all conditions precedent in section 40 of the Employment Act, including notice to the labour officer, fair selection criteria, notice or pay in lieu, and severance pay of not less than 15 days per completed year of service.
  • The obligation to hear an employee under section 41(2) of the Employment Act applies even where the employer is restructuring or declaring positions redundant.
  • Labour is not a mere commodity; employees have a right to fair treatment at work under Article 41 of the Constitution.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the claimant was unfairly terminated
  2. 2.Compensation at 10 months salary amounting to Kshs.1,688,460.00
  3. 3.Severance pay amounting to Kshs.1,097,499.00
  4. 4.One month notice pay amounting to Kshs.168,460.00
  5. 5.19 days worked in September 2011 amounting to Kshs.106,935.00
  6. 6.56 leave days amounting to Kshs.317,993.00
  7. 7.Total dues of Kshs.2,188,366.00 after offsetting the sum of Kshs.1,190,981.00 already received
  8. 8.The claimant be issued with a Certificate of Service by the Respondent within 14 days
  9. 9.Costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Act, 2007section 35
  • Employment Act, 2007section 40(1)
  • Employment Act, 2007section 41 and 41(2)
  • Employment Act, 2007section 43
  • Employment Act, 2007section 45
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 41

Cases cited (2)

  • Kenya Union of Commercial Food and Allied Workers Union [KUCFAW] v. British American Tobacco Limited
    Industrial Court of Kenya Cause Number 143 of 2007
  • Aviation and Allied Workers Union versus Kenya Airways and others
    Industrial Cause No. 1616 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Industrial Court of Kenya jurisdiction under the Employment Act, 2007 and Article 41 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sylvester Odour Oyile v Prime Fuels (Kenya) Limited [2013] KEELRC 625 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Cause No. 340 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/625/eng@2013-06-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.