Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause Number 494 of 2012· [2013] KEELRC 535 (KLR)

Eunice Endoveria Jamwaka v Trade House Africa Limited [2013] KEELRC 535 (KLR)

Industrial Court at Nairobi
12 July 2013
2,141 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled the cleaner quit on her own, not unfairly dismissed, but her employer still owed her unpaid housing allowance and leave pay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, employed by the Respondent in August 2010 as a Cleaner at Yaya Centre on a monthly salary of Kshs. 8,500, claimed she was summarily dismissed on 2nd January 2012 and sought a declaration of unfair termination plus various dues totalling Kshs. 241,078, including 12 months' compensation, notice pay, pro-rata leave, house rent allowance, salary deductions, service gratuity, overtime and monthly refunds of Kshs. 380. The Respondent replied that the Claimant deserted work on 30th December 2011 after being notified that its cleaning contract with Yaya Centre was ending, and counterclaimed one month's salary in notice pay. After hearing the Claimant and two witnesses for the Respondent, the court found the Claimant left employment of her own volition on 30th December 2011, believing the Yaya contract was at an end, and that there was no evidence the Respondent instigated termination. Termination was therefore not unfair and 12 months' compensation was rejected. Both claims for notice pay, including the Respondent's counterclaim, were rejected, as were claims for salary reduction, the Kshs. 380 monthly refund, overtime and service gratuity (the Claimant being an N.S.S.F member). However, applying Section 31 of the Employment Act 2007, the court found the Respondent failed to provide housing or pay house rent allowance, awarding 15% of salary for 16 months (Kshs. 20,400), and allowed unopposed leave of Kshs. 9,153. The Respondent was ordered to pay a total of Kshs. 29,553 within 30 days, with no order on costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Claimant was terminated or deserted employment

Holding

The Claimant left employment of her own volition; there was no termination by the Respondent and termination was not unfair

Reasoning

The Respondent's cleaning contract with Yaya Centre was due to lapse and employees had been notified. The Claimant, believing the relationship was over, left on 30th December 2011 without waiting. The court found she made a conscious decision to move on, had a cavalier attitude, malingered to obtain off-duty days, and there was no evidence the Respondent instigated termination.

p. 4
02

Entitlement to house rent allowance

Holding

Granted at 15% of Kshs. 8,500 for 16 months, totalling Kshs. 20,400

Reasoning

Section 31 of the Employment Act 2007 obliges the employer to secure reasonable housing accommodation or pay a reasonable house rent allowance. The pay slips had a blank house rent allowance column, showing no housing element was paid. The court awarded 15% of the monthly salary of Kshs. 8,500 for 16 months of service.

p. 4
03

Entitlement to leave

Holding

Leave allowed for the one completed year and four months on pro-rata basis, Kshs. 9,153

Reasoning

The Respondent conceded the Claimant did not take leave, seeking only to offset it against its counterclaim, which failed. The court allowed leave for the completed year and four months on a pro-rata basis, computing 6,865 plus 2,288 to arrive at Kshs. 9,153.

p. 4
04

Notice pay claims by both parties

Holding

Both the Claimant's claim and the Respondent's counterclaim for notice pay rejected

Reasoning

The Yaya contract was ending and the Respondent had notified all employees. Both parties understood there would be no work from January 2012. The court found it incoherent for the Respondent to expect notice pay from the Claimant after it had itself notified employees of the contract's end.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer who fails to secure reasonable housing accommodation for an employee or pay a house rent allowance is liable under Section 31 of the Employment Act 2007, and pay slips that do not capture the housing element do not displace that liability.
  • Where an employee leaves employment of her own volition, there is no termination by the employer and no compensation for unfair termination lies.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that termination was not unfair
  2. 2.The Respondent shall pay to the Claimant arrears of house rent allowance at Kshs. 20,400, and unused leave days at Kshs. 9,153, total Kshs. 29,553
  3. 3.The said amount be paid within 30 days of the delivery of the Award
  4. 4.No order on the costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 31
Jurisdiction invoked
Reference to the Industrial Court under the Employment Act 2007; dispute over unfair and unlawful termination

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Eunice Endoveria Jamwaka v Trade House Africa Limited [2013] KEELRC 535 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Cause Number 494 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/535/eng@2013-07-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.