TRANSPORT AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION (K) V AFRICAN SKY CHARTERS [2013] KEELRC 527 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Grounds for review under Rule 32(1) of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010
No new and important matter, no error apparent on the face of the record, and no breach of written law was established to warrant review of the recognition award
The court analysed the award against the four limbs of Rule 32(1). The original award was based on Section 5(2) of the repealed Trade Disputes Act, and the judge had made findings of fact that the Claimant was the correct union, there was no rival union, and a simple majority of 10 out of 15 employees had been recruited. The applicant disclosed no new facts, and subsequent resignations could not alter the position since membership is assessed at the time of the recognition application. The resignations were earlier found to be products of employer intimidation.
Material time for assessing union membership for recognition
Membership strength is determined at the time of recruitment/application for recognition, not at the time of the review application
The respondent argued that three employees had resigned and a 2010 survey showed diminished support, so the union no longer commanded a simple majority. The original judge rejected the resignations as voluntary, finding they resulted from harassment and intimidation, and declared the employer's survey an illegal activity amounting to intimidation. On review, the court reaffirmed that the threshold of 51% (10 of 15 employees) must be assessed at the time of application, and nothing on record showed the threshold was not met then.
Legal principles established
#- The percentage of union members recruited is reckoned at the time the application for recognition is made, not subsequently
- Where the judge who made the award is no longer a judge of the court, the court may justly and equitably consider a review application
Court orders
#- 1.The Application for review, setting aside and vacating the Award of 2nd December 2010 is dismissed
- 2.Costs of the application awarded to the Claimant/Respondent
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Rule 32(1) of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 (application for review of an award)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "TRANSPORT AND ALLIED WORKERS UNION (K) V AFRICAN SKY CHARTERS [2013] KEELRC 527 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/527/eng@2013-01-24
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.