Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause 448 of 2011· [2013] KEELRC 488 (KLR)

TRANSPORT & ALLIED WORKERS UNION v DUALE TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD [2013] KEELRC 488 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
24 January 2013
617 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that employees receiving NSSF pension payouts cannot also claim service pay, and stale leave claims without written demand fail.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Industrial Court award, delivered by Principal Judge Mathews N. Nduma on 24 January 2013 in Nairobi, determined a claim by the Transport & Allied Workers Union on behalf of grievant Joseph Cheriyot Chirchir against Duale Transport Services Ltd. The grievant, employed as a heavy commercial driver from 1987, claimed service pay at 15 days' salary per completed year, one month's salary in lieu of notice (Kshs.20,000), and payment in lieu of leave days for 2006 and 2007 (Kshs.28,000). He had driven truck KTQ 571 until its sale to Eagle Freight in April 2008, after which he moved to the new employer with the Respondent's assistance and was retrenched there in 2010, receiving a lump sum NSSF pension. The Respondent denied terminating his employment, showed it had regularly remitted NSSF contributions, and denied any outstanding leave days; it called no witness but relied on its pleadings. The court found the grievant was registered with NSSF and had received a lump sum pension, defeating the service pay claim, and dismissed the leave claim as a non-credible afterthought since no demand had been made on leaving in 2008. The court found the Respondent had never terminated the grievant's employment. However, giving effect to the Respondent's in-court offer of one month's salary in lieu of notice, recorded as an order of the Court, the court awarded the grievant Kshs.20,000. There was no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Service pay entitlement

Holding

The claim for service pay fails because the grievant was registered with NSSF, contributions were remitted, and he received a lump sum pension on retrenchment in 2010

Reasoning

The court analysed the facts and found the grievant was registered with NSSF during his employment with the Respondent, which regularly remitted its contributions. The grievant admitted receiving a lump sum pension from NSSF when he stopped working in 2010, which disentitled him to severance from the Respondent when he moved to the purchaser of the truck.

p. 2
02

Leave days claim

Holding

The claim for payment in lieu of leave for 2006 and 2007 is dismissed as an afterthought and not credible

Reasoning

The grievant did not demonstrate he was owed leave days and made no written demand when he left the Respondent in 2008. The claim surfaced only after his retrenchment by the new employer in 2010, leading the court to find it not credible and to dismiss it.

p. 2
03

Whether employment was terminated

Holding

The Respondent never terminated the grievant's employment; it helped him transition to the purchaser of the truck

Reasoning

The truck the grievant drove was sold to Eagle Freight, which took him up as a driver with the Respondent's help. He worked for the new company until retrenched in 2010. The court found no termination by the Respondent, so no claim for notice or severance from it arose on that footing.

p. 2
04

Salary in lieu of notice

Holding

The grievant is entitled to Kshs.20,000, being the one month's salary in lieu of notice the Respondent offered in court

Reasoning

During the hearing the Respondent offered to pay one month's salary in lieu of notice to settle the matter, and the offer was recorded as an order of the Court. The court gave effect to that recorded offer by ordering payment of Kshs.20,000.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An employee registered with NSSF whose contributions were regularly remitted and who received a lump sum pension is not entitled to service pay from the former employer
  • A claim for payment in lieu of untaken leave raised long after leaving employment, without prior written demand, is an afterthought and lacks credibility

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the grievant's claims for service pay and payment in lieu of leave days
  2. 2.Payment of Kshs.20,000 (one month's salary in lieu of notice) to the grievant pursuant to the Respondent's recorded offer
  3. 3.No order as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction of the Industrial Court over employment disputes (the judgment does not cite a specific provision)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "TRANSPORT & ALLIED WORKERS UNION v DUALE TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD [2013] KEELRC 488 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Cause 448 of 2011. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/488/eng@2013-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.