Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCOtherApplication under Certificate of Urgency dated 28th July 2011, filed 9th August 2011; Memorandum of Claim dated 28th July 2011· [2013] KEELRC 457 (KLR)

KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL, FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS V UKWALA SUPERMARKET LTD [2013] KEELRC 457 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
27 February 2013
2,241 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant Union, through its Director Benson D. Luvayi, filed an urgent application on 9th August 2011 seeking orders restraining the Respondent employer from victimizing, intimidating, harassing, terminating or dismissing union members on account of their Trade Union membership, alleging it had recruited 915 employees (over 51% of the unionisable workforce) between 2008 and 2011 and had been unlawfully denied recognition. The Respondent, through HR Manager Joshua Were, denied the union had ever attained a simple majority, contended the dispute had not been properly conciliated, alleged forgery of 53 employees' signatures, and raised preliminary objections on jurisdiction (absence of a certificate of unresolved dispute under Section 69 of the Labour Relations Act and Rule 6 of the Industrial Court Procedure Rules 2010), limitation under Section 90 of the Employment Act, defective execution of check-off forms under Section 35(b) and 35(6) of the Labour Relations Act, and want of authority of the signatory. The Court dismissed the jurisdictional objection, holding that an application under Section 74(a) need not await a certificate of conciliation. On limitation, it held the cause of action arose on 6th July 2011 when the Respondent declined to meet the union to sign a recognition agreement. The objections on execution of the check-off forms were held to be factual, not true points of law. Rather than decide the membership dispute on the affidavits, the Court directed a verification exercise of the union's membership under the supervision of the Minister for Labour with a report within 30 days, ordered the Respondent to deduct and remit dues from employees whose check-off forms were not in dispute, and reserved further directives pending the Minister's report.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction absent certificate of unresolved dispute

Holding

The point in limine on jurisdiction was dismissed; an application under Section 74(a) may be entertained without a certificate under Section 69

Reasoning

The Respondent argued that Sections 74(a), 62 and 69 of the Labour Relations Act and Rule 6(1)(b) of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010 required a conciliator's report and certificate, or an affidavit explaining its absence. The Court held that an application under Section 74(a) need not await the certificate and that it had jurisdiction over both the Application and the Claim as filed.

p. 5
02

Limitation under Section 90 of the Employment Act

Holding

The claim was not time-barred; the cause of action arose on 6th July 2011 when the Respondent declined to meet the union

Reasoning

The recruitment and alleged victimization occurred between 2008 and 2011, and the conciliator's last report of 11th December 2009 fell within the three-year period. The Court thus fixed the accrual of the cause of action at the employer's refusal of 6th July 2011.

p. 4
03

Execution of check-off forms by allegedly non-official union officers

Holding

The objection was dismissed as not a true point of law

Reasoning

The Respondent contended the check-off forms violated Section 35(6) of the Labour Relations Act because signed by non-officers, and that Boniface M. Kavuvi lacked authority. The Court found the objection required examination of the facts and could not be determined as a preliminary point of law.

p. 5
04

Verification of 51% membership

Holding

The Court opted for a practical, supervised verification exercise rather than resolving the dispute on affidavits

Reasoning

Upon perusal of documents filed on 4th September 2012, the Court considered that verifying the union's current membership would facilitate a pro-active resolution rather than engaging in technicalities. It directed a verification under the Minister for Labour with a report within 30 days, and interim deduction of dues from undisputed check-off forms.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • An application under Section 74(a) of the Labour Relations Act need not await a certificate of conciliation; the court's jurisdiction is not defeated by its absence
  • For limitation purposes under Section 90 of the Employment Act, the cause of action for refusal of recognition arises when the employer declines to meet the union to sign a recognition agreement
  • Objections that require resolution of facts, such as allegations of improper execution of check-off forms, are not true points of law for determination in limine

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A verification exercise to be conducted under the supervision of the Minister for Labour and/or his appointed representative to verify whether or not the Claimant/Applicant has attained 51% membership of the unionisable employees of the Respondent, with a report filed with the Court within 30 days from the date of the order
  2. 2.The Respondent directed to deduct and remit union dues from all employees who have requested deductions through the signed check-off forms not in dispute
  3. 3.The Court to make further directives upon receipt of the Minister's Report
  4. 4.The preliminary objections in limine dismissed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations ActSection 54
  • Labour Relations ActSection 62
  • Labour Relations ActSection 69(a)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 74 / 74(a)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 35(b)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 35(6)
  • Labour Relations ActSection 90
  • Employment ActSection 90
  • Constitution of Kenya2010 Constitution (general reference)
  • Industrial Court (Procedure) RulesRule 6(1)(b), Rule 6(2)
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 74(a) of the Labour Relations Act, 2007 (read with Sections 62, 69 and 35(6)); Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules 2010, Rule 6

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "KENYA UNION OF COMMERCIAL, FOOD AND ALLIED WORKERS V UKWALA SUPERMARKET LTD [2013] KEELRC 457 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Application under Certificate of Urgency dated 28th July 2011, filed 9th August 2011; Memorandum of Claim dated 28th July 2011. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/457/eng@2013-02-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.