KENYA UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND ALLIED WORKERS V NATION MEDIA GROUP LIMITED & ANOTHER [2013] KEELRC 397 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Industrial Court confirmed CBAs cover all unionisable employees, but dismissed the union's claim because it lacked evidence proving which workers were denied benefits.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Scope of CBA application - members only or all unionisable employees
The CBA applies to all unionisable employees, not only union members; a registered CBA is not a commercial contract governed by privity
Section 59 of the Labour Relations Act provides that a collective agreement binds the parties, all unionisable employees of the employer, and that its terms are incorporated into every covered employee's contract. Recognition is granted to a union as representative of all employees eligible for membership, not members alone. Agency fee provisions under Sections 48 and 49 confirm the union is sole collective bargaining agent even for non-members.
Evidentiary burden on the union to prove denial of CBA benefits
The Claimant failed to prove which employees were eligible and denied benefits
The union's lists contained only names without job categorisations, pay slips or testimony. They included supervisory staff expressly excluded under the Recognition Agreement (Editor/Editor-in-Chief, Deputy Editor/Managing Editor, News Editor/Chief Reporter, Chief Sub-Editor). Affected employees should have been called to testify. The court could not find on eligibility from bare lists.
Whether the Owino letter of 6th July 2010 was an admission
The letter did not admit liability; it related to a separate dispute over agency fees
The letter seemed to refer to another dispute, Industrial Court Cause 545 [N] of 2004, where agency fee orders had issued, and was written a week before the Claim was filed. The union should have called the employees who disowned it in that correspondence to testify rather than relying on the letter as an admission.
Validity of appointment letters excluding union representation
Such clauses would violate the Bill of Rights, but no order could issue on a 2007 letter predating the CBA and the Labour Relations Act
The letter to Michael Bwire Mugwang'a dated 7th August 2007 predated the CBA, was not shown to be the standard or current letter at the material time, and had no nexus with the dispute. The court nonetheless warned employers to conform to the new constitutional age by shredding such letters and rewriting employment terms.
Legal principles established
#- A registered collective agreement binds all unionisable employees, not only union members, and its terms are incorporated into individual contracts of employment
- A trade union has capacity to seek interpretation of a CBA on all matters arising under it, without restriction
- Trade union membership is not what determines the scope of CBA application; the focus is on eligibility for union membership
- Letters of appointment barring unionisable employees from trade union membership would violate the Bill of Rights
Court orders
#- 1.Award dismissing the Claim in its totality
- 2.No order on the costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Labour Relations Act No. 14 of 2007; dispute over a registered Collective Bargaining Agreement within the Industrial Court's jurisdiction
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (4)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Forum for Good Governance and Human Rights v Public Service Commission & 4 others; Central Organization of Trade Unions (COTU-K) & 2 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E058 of 2023) [2025] KEELRC 83 (KLR)[2025] KEELRC 83 (KLR)23 Jan 2025
- Kenya Hotels and Allied Workers Union v Panari Hotel; Gitau (Interested Party) (Cause 218 of 2019) [2024] KEELRC 1076 (KLR)[2024] KEELRC 1076 (KLR)8 May 2024
- Kenya Aviation Workers Union v Bollore Africa Logistics – Kenya & another [2016] KEELRC 1539 (KLR)[2016] KEELRC 1539 (KLR)23 Feb 2016
- Transport And Allied Workers Union v Societe Internationale De Telecommunication Aeoronautiques (Sita) [2016] KEELRC 1804 (KLR)[2016] KEELRC 1804 (KLR)22 Jan 2016applied
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "KENYA UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND ALLIED WORKERS V NATION MEDIA GROUP LIMITED & ANOTHER [2013] KEELRC 397 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Cause 799 of 2010. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/397/eng@2013-04-26
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.