Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment (memorandum of claim filed 17.10.2010; related cause No. 1100 of 2010 referenced)· [2013] KEELRC 375 (KLR)

TAILORS AND TEXTILES WORKERS’ UNION V NAKURU INDUSTRIES LIMITED [2013] KEELRC 375 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya (Employment and Labour Relations Court)
3 May 2013
1,121 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Employment Court ruled that employees qualify for gratuity after just one year of service unless a collective agreement says otherwise.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Tailors and Textiles Workers' Union filed a memorandum of claim on 17 October 2010 against Nakuru Industries Limited, which responded on 4 February 2013. At the hearing on 25 April 2013 the parties agreed that the sole dispute concerned clause 34 of their registered collective bargaining agreement (1 July 2011 to 30 June 2013), specifically the qualifying period for gratuity. The union argued for qualification from the date of employment, noting that many members on short-term contracts were terminated as they approached one year's service; the respondent initially agreed to one year but later reneged, insisting on two years for temporary and seven years for permanent staff. The respondent further contended the matter had been settled in cause No. 1100 of 2010 and that 74 allegedly forced resignations carried no liability. The court held the qualifying-period issue was not determined on its merits in the earlier cause, so it was properly before the court. Applying section 35(5) of the Employment Act, 2007 as the statutory benchmark, the court fixed the basic qualifying period at one year for both temporary and permanent union employees, effective from the judgment date, and directed the Deputy Registrar to register the order as part of the CBA. However, the claim for twelve months' compensation and arrears for the 74 employees failed for want of evidence of unfair termination, as did the other prayers. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Qualifying period for gratuity under clause 34 of the CBA

Holding

One year of service from initial appointment applies to both temporary and permanent union employees unless the parties agree more favourable terms

Reasoning

Section 35(5) of the Employment Act, 2007 entitles a terminated employee to service pay for every year worked on terms to be fixed. Since the parties fixed the rates by agreement but disputed the qualifying period, the court supplied the statutory benchmark of one year, while allowing the parties to vary it by agreement. The order takes effect from the judgment date to avoid ambushing employees already terminated during negotiations.

p. 2
02

Res judicata / abuse of process in light of cause No. 1100 of 2010

Holding

The qualifying-period issue was not determined on its merits in cause No. 1100 of 2010, so raising it here was not an abuse of process

Reasoning

The earlier award had left the issue to be resolved by a conciliator, and conciliation had failed to produce an amicable resolution. The court therefore found it proper for the claimant to litigate the qualifying period in this cause.

p. 2
03

Alleged unfair termination and forced resignations of 74 employees

Holding

Claim for twelve months' compensation and arrears not established for want of evidence

Reasoning

The claimant did not prove that the 74 listed employees were terminated or that the terminations were unfair; the respondent's own witnesses were still in employment and denied union membership or liability. The evidential burden rested on the claimant and was not discharged.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where parties have not agreed a qualifying period for gratuity, the statutory benchmark in section 35(5) of the Employment Act, 2007 fixes the basic qualifying period at one year of service
  • Parties may enhance or reduce the qualifying period by collective agreement

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Until and unless the parties agree to more favourable terms, the qualifying period for gratuity for both temporary and permanent union employees of the respondent shall be service of one year from the initial date of appointment, effective from the date of judgment
  2. 2.The Deputy Registrar shall cause the order in (a) registered as part of the collective agreement between the parties
  3. 3.Each party to pay own costs of this cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment Actsection 37
  • Employment Actsection 35(5)
Jurisdiction invoked
First-instance jurisdiction over a trade dispute concerning a collective bargaining agreement (dispute referred under the Labour Relations Act framework, read with the Employment Act, 2007)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "TAILORS AND TEXTILES WORKERS’ UNION V NAKURU INDUSTRIES LIMITED [2013] KEELRC 375 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Not stated in judgment (memorandum of claim filed 17.10.2010; related cause No. 1100 of 2010 referenced). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/375/eng@2013-05-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.