Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCAllowedNot stated in the judgment as provided· [2013] KEELRC 299 (KLR)

JIM NHLAPO MASEGE V SECRETARY GENERAL, AVIATION & ALLIED WORKERS UNION & ANOTHER [2013] KEELRC 299 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
17 May 2013
1,014 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Industrial Court ruled that a union Secretary General cannot cancel election results, and the Registrar must register duly elected officials once proper results arrive.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant, founder of the Aviation and Allied Workers Union, contested the position of Branch Secretary of the Airlines Branch in elections held on 5th February 2011 under the supervision of Ministry of Labour officers. Though no longer a member of the Union, Clause 20(d) of the Union Constitution permitted a non-member to contest the Branch Secretary position upon a timely application and payment of a Kshs.10,000 refundable-free deposit, which the Claimant evidenced. He was duly elected, and the District Labour Officer transmitted the results to the Registrar of Trade Unions on 8th February 2011. However, the Secretary General (1st Respondent) submitted Form Q of the Second Schedule to the Labour Relations Act, 2007 omitting the Claimant's name, and the Registrar (2nd Respondent) consequently did not register him, leaving the Secretary position recorded as vacant. The Union alleged the Claimant was ineligible on account of his controversial 2009 departure, a theft charge from which he was acquitted, and an alleged letter of 3rd February 2011 notifying him of ineligibility; the court found the letter dubiously addressed and unproven as received. The court held that the Secretary General had no lawful authority to nullify an election under Section 34(1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2007, that the Registrar was obliged to register all elected officials named in results received in the prescribed form, and that the omission was mischievous and driven by personal vendetta. The court declared the Claimant lawfully elected and ordered registration within seven days, with costs against the 1st Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Lawfulness of the Claimant's election as Branch Secretary

Holding

The Claimant was duly elected Branch Secretary in elections held on 5th February 2011 supervised by the Ministry of Labour, and his candidacy was permitted by Clause 20(d) of the Union Constitution allowing non-members who pay the prescribed deposit to contest the Branch Secretary position.

Reasoning

The court found as common cause that the elections were conducted and supervised by a Ministry of Labour officer, and the results were transmitted to the Registrar of Trade Unions by the District Labour Officer. The Union Constitution expressly allowed a non-member to contest the Branch Secretary position upon payment of a Kshs.10,000 deposit and timely application, both of which the Claimant evidenced. The Respondent's allegation of ineligibility was not lawfully acted upon.

p. 2
02

Authority of the Secretary General to omit an elected official from Form Q

Holding

The Secretary General had no lawful authority to omit the Claimant's name from Form Q; the conduct was mischievous, contrary to the Union Constitution and the Labour Relations Act 2007, and appeared driven by personal vendetta.

Reasoning

The court held that the Secretary General demonstrated no lawful power to nullify an election conducted under Section 34(1). The letter of 3rd February 2011 informing the Claimant of ineligibility was dubiously addressed (marked c/o Airline Branch with no address) and the Claimant denied receiving it. The court characterised the omission as mischievous and an improper injection of personal vendetta into public office.

p. 2
03

Duty of the Registrar of Trade Unions

Holding

The Registrar was obliged to register all elected officials, including the Claimant, upon receipt of the results in the prescribed form from the returning officer; failure to do so was unlawful.

Reasoning

The Registrar did not file any response to the claim. The court emphasised that the Registrar is duty bound to act according to the law, and that registering the vacancy as though the Secretary position were vacant despite due election reflected badly on the integrity of the office. Registration was therefore directed within seven days.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A Secretary General has no lawful authority to nullify the outcome of a union election conducted under Section 34(1) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2007.
  • Once the Registrar of Trade Unions receives election results in the prescribed form from the returning officer, the Registrar is obliged to register all the elected officials including the Branch Secretary.
  • Disputes ensuing from notification of elected officials under Section 34(3) are resolvable only by reference to the Industrial Court under Section 34(4).

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the Claimant was the lawfully elected Secretary of the Airlines Branch, Nairobi of the Aviation & Allied Workers Union on 5th February, 2011
  2. 2.The Registrar of Trade Unions to register the Claimant as Branch Secretary forthwith and in any event within 7 days of the judgment
  3. 3.The 1st Respondent to pay the costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Labour Relations Act, 2007Second Schedule, Form Q
  • Industrial Relations Act, 2007Section 34(1)
  • Industrial Relations Act, 2007Section 34(3)
  • Industrial Relations Act, 2007Section 34(4)
  • Constitution of the Aviation and Allied Workers UnionClause 20(d)
Jurisdiction invoked
Trade dispute over union elections under Section 34 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2007, with disputes arising from such elections referable to the Industrial Court under Section 34(4)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "JIM NHLAPO MASEGE V SECRETARY GENERAL, AVIATION & ALLIED WORKERS UNION & ANOTHER [2013] KEELRC 299 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/299/eng@2013-05-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.