Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause Number 639 of 2012· [2013] KEELRC 146 (KLR)

Kenya Scientific Research International Technical and Allied Institutions Workers Union v Kenya Agricultural Research Institute & another [2013] KEELRC 146 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
18 September 2013
1,529 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Industrial Court ruled employers must let unions onto workplace premises to recruit staff, as long as the union gives notice and doesn't disrupt work.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Claimant Union, a registered trade union mandated by its Constitution to represent unionisable employees in scientific research institutions, sought an order compelling the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), a State Corporation, to grant it access to the Respondent's premises and Head Office to recruit unionisable employees. Neither the Claimant nor the Interested Party Union (UNIRISK) was formally recognized by the Respondent. The Respondent and the Interested Party objected that the claim was res judicata, relying on prior Industrial Court causes (including Cause 575 of 2010 granting UNIRISK access, and Cause 48 N of 2009 requiring the Claimant to submit fresh check off forms, which it failed to do). Rika J rejected the res judicata objection, holding that trade union recognition is a continuous process and the industrial justice system applies res judicata with caution, as the same issues can legitimately re-arise between the same parties. The Court held that freedom of association embraces both the right to associate and to dissociate; the right of access for recruitment is inherent in legitimate trade union activity, subject only to reasonable regulation as to notification and timing. The Court found the Respondent's restriction of access violated freedom of association and noted the Claimant's long association with the Respondent's employees since 2003. The Court allowed the claim, granting the Claimant access to recruit, subject to 7 days' notice and recruitment confined to tea, lunch breaks or close of business, and made no order on costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Res judicata in trade disputes

Holding

The res judicata objection fails; prior causes did not bar the present claim

Reasoning

The Court held that recognition of trade unions is a continuous process, and issues over recognition can legitimately re-arise between the same parties. Prior determinations in Causes 48 N of 2009, 355 of 2009 and 575 of 2010 did not finally settle the question of access and recruitment. The industrial justice system applies res judicata with caution, since the phrase 'final' is relative in labour disputes, particularly regarding recognition and collective bargaining.

02

Access to workplace for union recruitment

Holding

The Claimant is granted access to recruit, subject to notice and timing conditions

Reasoning

The Court found the right of access inherent in legitimate trade union activity under the Constitution and the Labour Relations Act. The failure to submit fresh check off forms as ordered in Cause 48 N of 2009 may have resulted from lack of access. The access orders earlier granted to the Interested Party did not bar the Claimant, and it would be unreasonable to deny the Claimant access given its long association with the Respondent's employees since 2003.

p. 3
03

Freedom of association and competing unions

Holding

Employees remain free to join, leave and shift between trade unions regardless of recognition

Reasoning

Recognition rests on freedom of association, which includes the right to dissociate as much as to associate. Recruitment is a continuous process and even where an employer has recognized one union, employees are not barred from shifting allegiance to another. The Court urged the competing unions to resolve their differences at their own level with the assistance of the Trade Union Centre.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Res judicata should be applied with caution in trade disputes, as recognition is a continuous process and the same issues can legitimately re-arise between the same parties
  • The right of access to workplaces for recruitment is inherent in legitimate trade union activity, subject only to reasonable regulation such as notification of the employer and timing
  • Freedom of association encompasses both the right to associate and to dissociate; employees may shift allegiance between trade unions even after recognition of one union

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Respondent shall grant the Claimant Union access to its premises for purposes of recruitment of unionisable employees as members of the Claimant Union
  2. 2.The Claimant shall notify the Respondent at least 7 days before undertaking such exercise
  3. 3.Recruitment shall be undertaken during tea, lunch breaks, and/or the close of business, and shall not be timed to disrupt the normal performance of duties by potential recruits
  4. 4.No order on the costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenyanot specified (freedom of association provisions)
  • Labour Relations Actnot specified
  • Civil Procedure Lawres judicata doctrine
Jurisdiction invoked
Industrial Court jurisdiction over trade disputes referred under the Labour Relations Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Scientific Research International Technical and Allied Institutions Workers Union v Kenya Agricultural Research Institute & another [2013] KEELRC 146 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Cause Number 639 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/146/eng@2013-09-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.