Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union v Plantation Plants (K) Limited [2013] KEELRC 115 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Industrial Court paused execution of a Kshs.19.5 million award, but only if the employer deposits the full amount in a joint account within 30 days.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether a pending appeal exists to anchor a stay of execution
The Notice of Appeal originally attached related to a different case (Cause No. 25 of 2012), but the court perused the record and found a proper Notice of Appeal dated 5th July 2013 and filed on 8th July 2013, and therefore proceeded to consider the application on its merits.
The application had annexed a Notice of Appeal relating to Industrial Cause No. 25 of 2012 between the same parties but a different cause. Counsel sought to produce a correct notice from the bar; the court upheld the claimant's objection, holding a notice not filed with the court before the application could not be introduced later. However, on perusal of the file a proper notice was found on record, curing the defect and permitting consideration on the merits.
Whether the intended appeal is arguable
The court assumed, in favour of the applicant, that the appeal is arguable, though it was clearly open to doubt, and granted a conditional stay.
The appeal raised points of law under Sections 41 and 43 of the Employment Act and Section 80 of the Labour Relations Act concerning dismissals arising from collective industrial action. The court held its role was merely to ensure the appeal was not frivolous or vexatious. Although it doubted the merits—expressing the view that Section 41 protections apply before collective disciplinary action after an unlawful strike—it assumed arguability in the applicant's favour.
Protection of the award beneficiary pending appeal
The stay was made conditional on deposit of the entire decretal amount of Kshs.19,535,302.95 into a joint interest-earning account within thirty days, failing which the application stands dismissed with costs.
To balance the applicant's appellate rights against the claimant's right to enjoy the fruits of the award, the court required security in the full decretal sum held jointly in an interest-earning account. This preserves the position of both parties and deters an appeal pursued only to delay satisfaction of the award.
Legal principles established
#- A stay of execution pending appeal cannot be granted where no notice of appeal has been lodged; the standard questions become moot.
- On a stay application the court's role is limited to confirming the appeal is not frivolous or vexatious, not to decide the substantive matters.
- Under Kenyan law an ultimatum does not substitute for the hearing required by Section 41 of the Employment Act before dismissal for misconduct, including participation in an unlawful strike.
Court orders
#- 1.Stay of execution of the judgment/award of 19th March 2013 and 26th June 2013 granted conditionally upon the Respondent depositing the entire decretal amount of Kshs.19,535,302.95 in a joint interest-earning account in a reputable bank in the names of the Claimant union and the Respondent and/or their legal representatives within thirty (30) days
- 2.If the deposit is not made within thirty days, the application for stay stands dismissed with costs
- 3.If the money is deposited, stay of execution remains until the hearing and determination of the intended appeal
- 4.Costs of the motion to be in the appeal
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Industrial Court Act No. 20 of 2011, Section 17 (appeals lie to the Court of Appeal) and the court's incidental powers on stay of execution
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (1)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers’ Union v Roseto Flowers [2013] KEELRC 587 (KLR)[2013] KEELRC 587 (KLR)28 Jun 2013followed
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kenya Plantation & Agricultural Workers Union v Plantation Plants (K) Limited [2013] KEELRC 115 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Cause No. 1153 of 2012. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/115/eng@2013-09-06
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.