Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELRCPartially AllowedCause No. 1809 of 2011· [2013] KEELRC 40 (KLR)

Noel George Khaaba v Wanandege Housing Co-Op Society Limited [2013] KEELRC 40 (KLR)

Industrial Court of Kenya
20 December 2013
1,442 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court upheld dismissal of a probationary employee for poor performance but ordered the employer to issue a certificate of service.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The claimant, Noel George Khaaba, sued Wanandege Housing Co-op Society Limited alleging unfair and wrongful termination of his employment as Assistant Accountant, breach of contract regarding medical cover, life insurance and probation, failure to issue a certificate of service, and failure to pay notice pay. He was employed on 2nd June 2011 on a three-month probation and was terminated without confirmation, receiving a letter of termination and, on his own cross-examination, payment of one month's salary in lieu of notice. The respondent, through its Memorandum of Reply and the testimony of DW1 Peter Mukunzi Omutititi, contended that the claimant's performance lapses were noticed within a month of appointment, that he attributed them to an overwhelming workload, and that the probation period was properly used to dismiss him for want of performance, with notice pay and an explanation letter issued. The court framed three issues: whether the termination was unfair, wrongful and unlawful; entitlement to relief; and costs. Applying Section 45 of the Employment Act, 2007, the court held the dismissal fair, finding the claimant a non-performer who did not rebut the respondent's case of incapacity to perform. The claim was dismissed, but the court ordered issuance of a certificate of service as mandatory in law, and directed that each party bear its own costs. Judgment was delivered on 20th December 2013 by D.K.N. Marete, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unfair, wrongful and unlawful

Holding

The termination was not unfair; the employer proved a valid reason (non-performance during probation) and complied with Section 45 of the Employment Act, 2007.

Reasoning

The claimant was employed on probation and failed to perform, exhibiting lapses noticed within a month of appointment. He did not rebut the respondent's case of incapacity to perform. Applying Section 45(2) and 45(5) of the Employment Act, the court found the reason valid and related to the employee's capability, and the dismissal congruent with the statute's requirements. The claimant had also been paid one month's salary in lieu of notice.

p. 3
02

Whether the claimant is entitled to the relief sought

Holding

The claimant is disentitled to all relief except a certificate of service, which is mandatory in law.

Reasoning

Having found no unfair dismissal, the heads of relief (notice pay, medical bills, general relief for unfair dismissal) fell away. However, the statutory entitlement to a certificate of service under the Employment Act survives and was ordered. Costs were left to each party.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An employer who proves a valid reason related to the employee's capability and acts in accordance with Section 45 of the Employment Act has not unfairly terminated employment.
  • Issuance of a certificate of service is mandatory in law notwithstanding dismissal of the claim.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The claim is dismissed.
  2. 2.The claimant be issued with a certificate of service.
  3. 3.Each party bears its own costs.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Employment ActSection 45(1), 45(2), 45(3), 45(4), 45(5)
  • Employment ActSection 46, Section 51, Section 41
Jurisdiction invoked
Jurisdiction of the Industrial Court over employment and labour relations disputes (Employment Act, 2007 invoked)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Noel George Khaaba v Wanandege Housing Co-Op Society Limited [2013] KEELRC 40 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2013). Cause No. 1809 of 2011. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2013/40/eng@2013-12-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.